• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国农民工为何返乡?探寻经济上的推拉因素与情感纽带。

Why do Chinese migrant workers return? Exploring economic push-pull factors and emotional ties.

作者信息

Zhou Qiong, Huang Zhe, Zeng Lining, Xu Jun

机构信息

College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

College of Business Administration, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0325848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325848. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325848
PMID:40674437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12270181/
Abstract

Over the past few decades, China's economic growth and urbanization have driven a significant migration of rural laborers to cities. Recently, however, an increasing number of migrant workers have chosen to return to their hometowns for employment opportunities. Understanding the factors influencing this return migration is crucial but challenging due to the complexity and diversity of these factors and their intricate interrelationships. Moreover, existing research on migrant workers' return lacks a systematic theoretical framework and comprehensive empirical analysis. To address these gaps, our study utilizes the "Push-Pull Theory" from migration theory to develop a comprehensive model. This model investigates how perceived benefits, trust, costs, and both personal and government support affect migrant workers' willingness to return. We employ structural equation modeling (SEM) for empirical analysis, revealing that perceived benefits, trust, and costs significantly influence migrant workers' perception of return support. This perception, in turn, enhances their willingness to return. Additionally, our findings show that government support positively moderates the relationship between perceived benefits and costs with return support. However, it does not significantly affect the relationship between perceived trust and support, indicating that policy incentives alone may not sufficiently build trust in hometowns. Furthermore, emotional factors-such as family and place attachment, community involvement, and quality of life in hometowns-indirectly influence the decision to return by shaping perceived benefits, trust, and costs. This study advances the application of Push-Pull Theory by integrating economic factors with emotional bonds in the context of return migration. It provides novel insights into how both economic incentives and emotional ties drive migrant workers' decisions to return, offering a more nuanced understanding of migration dynamics in China.

摘要

在过去几十年里,中国的经济增长和城市化推动了大量农村劳动力向城市迁移。然而,近年来,越来越多的农民工选择返回家乡寻找就业机会。由于影响返乡迁移的因素复杂多样且相互关系错综复杂,了解这些因素至关重要但也具有挑战性。此外,现有的关于农民工返乡的研究缺乏系统的理论框架和全面的实证分析。为了填补这些空白,我们的研究运用迁移理论中的“推 - 拉理论”构建了一个综合模型。该模型研究了感知利益、信任、成本以及个人和政府支持如何影响农民工的返乡意愿。我们采用结构方程模型(SEM)进行实证分析,结果表明感知利益、信任和成本显著影响农民工对返乡支持的认知。这种认知反过来又增强了他们的返乡意愿。此外我们的研究结果表明,政府支持正向调节感知利益和成本与返乡支持之间的关系。然而,它对感知信任与支持之间的关系没有显著影响,这表明仅靠政策激励可能不足以在故乡建立信任。此外,情感因素,如家庭和地方依恋、社区参与以及家乡的生活质量,通过塑造感知利益、信任和成本,间接影响返乡决策。本研究通过在返乡迁移背景下将经济因素与情感纽带相结合,推进了推 - 拉理论的应用。它为经济激励和情感纽带如何驱动农民工的返乡决策提供了新的见解,对中国的迁移动态有了更细致入微的理解。

相似文献

1
Why do Chinese migrant workers return? Exploring economic push-pull factors and emotional ties.中国农民工为何返乡?探寻经济上的推拉因素与情感纽带。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0325848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325848. eCollection 2025.
2
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
8
Perceptions of health and coping strategies among temporary migrant workers in East and Southeast Asia: a systematic review.东亚和东南亚临时移民工人的健康认知和应对策略:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Feb 15;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01840-7.
9
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural Land Transfer and Urban Settlement Intentions of Rural Migrants: Evidence from a Rural Land System Reform in China.农村土地流转与农村流动人口的城市定居意愿——基于中国农村土地制度改革的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 5;20(4):2817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042817.
2
Global patterns of migration of scholars with economic development.学者迁移与经济发展的全球格局。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2217937120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217937120. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Entrepreneurial effect of rural return migrants: Evidence from China.
返乡农民工的创业效应:来自中国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1078199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1078199. eCollection 2022.
4
Stay in Risk Area: Place Attachment, Efficacy Beliefs and Risk Coping.留在风险区:场所依恋、效能信念和风险应对。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042375.
5
Impact of Family Separation on Subjective Time Pressure and Mental Health in Refugees from the Middle East and Africa Resettled in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study.德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州中东和非洲难民重新安置后家庭分离对主观时间压力和心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;18(21):11722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111722.