Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死的早期抗炎治疗:23项随机试验和28220例患者中时间依赖性效应的网状Meta分析

Early anti-inflammatory therapy in acute myocardial infarction: A network meta-analysis of timing-dependent effects in 23 randomized trials and 28,220 patients.

作者信息

Rivero-Santana Borja, Saldaña-García Jesús, Jurado-Román Alfonso, Cantolla-Pablo Paula, Gil-Fernández Marta, López-Sendón José, Tardif Jean-Claude, Moreno Raúl, Fernández-Velasco María

机构信息

Cardiology Department. La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.

Cardiology Department. La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2025 Sep;408:120443. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.120443. Epub 2025 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The timing of anti-inflammatory therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be critical, yet has not been systematically assessed. While several agents have shown benefit in secondary prevention, their efficacy during the early inflammatory phase of AMI remains uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory therapies in AMI and whether early initiation within 24 h of symptom onset modifies clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials including 28,220 patients with AMI. Interventions included colchicine, anakinra (IL-1β inhibitor), tocilizumab (IL-6 inhibitor), varespladib (PLA2 inhibitor), losmapimod (p38 MAPK inhibitor), cyclosporine (mitochondrial pore inhibitor), and pexelizumab (complement C5 inhibitor). Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure (HF), and ischemic events. Treatment effects were summarized as incidence rate ratios (IRRs), defined as the ratio of incidence rates between intervention and control groups. Subgroup analyses stratified trials by treatment initiation ≤24 h vs > 24 h from symptom onset.

RESULTS

Colchicine significantly reduced MACE ([IRR] 0.71; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.97) and ischemic events (IRR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.43-0.98). Anakinra reduced HF events (IRR 0.38; 95 % CI 0.16-0.89). These effects were observed exclusively when treatment was initiated within 24 h. No benefit was seen with delayed therapy, and no other intervention showed clinical efficacy. Safety outcomes, including infection risk, were neutral across treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrates that anti-inflammatory therapy improves outcomes in AMI only when initiated early. Colchicine and anakinra were the only effective agents, highlighting a narrow therapeutic window and supporting a time-sensitive approach to inflammation-targeted treatment in AMI.

摘要

背景与目的

急性心肌梗死(AMI)抗炎治疗的时机可能至关重要,但尚未得到系统评估。虽然几种药物在二级预防中已显示出益处,但其在AMI早期炎症阶段的疗效仍不确定。本研究评估了抗炎治疗在AMI中的有效性,以及症状发作后24小时内尽早开始治疗是否会改善临床结局。

方法

我们对23项随机对照试验进行了网状荟萃分析,纳入了28220例AMI患者。干预措施包括秋水仙碱、阿那白滞素(IL-1β抑制剂)、托珠单抗(IL-6抑制剂)、伐瑞普拉德(PLA2抑制剂)、洛索美匹(p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶抑制剂)、环孢素(线粒体孔抑制剂)和培昔利珠单抗(补体C5抑制剂)。主要结局为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心力衰竭(HF)和缺血事件。治疗效果总结为发病率比(IRRs),定义为干预组与对照组发病率之比。亚组分析根据症状发作后治疗开始时间≤24小时与>24小时对试验进行分层。

结果

秋水仙碱显著降低了MACE(发病率比[IRR]0.71;95%置信区间[CI]0.53-0.97)和缺血事件(IRR 0.65;95%CI 0.43-0.98)。阿那白滞素降低了HF事件(IRR 0.38;95%CI 0.16-0.89)。这些效果仅在症状发作后24小时内开始治疗时观察到。延迟治疗未显示出益处,且没有其他干预措施显示出临床疗效。包括感染风险在内的安全性结局在各治疗组之间无差异。

结论

这项网状荟萃分析表明,抗炎治疗仅在早期开始时才能改善AMI的结局。秋水仙碱和阿那白滞素是唯一有效的药物,突出了狭窄的治疗窗,并支持在AMI中针对炎症进行时间敏感型治疗的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验