Barsky Benjamin A, Yan Shapei, Rosenthal Meredith B
University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, United States.
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Sep 1;274:112775. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112775. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
Opioid overdose is the leading cause of death among recently incarcerated people. Take-home methadone flexibilities adopted at the COVID-19 pandemic's outset may have facilitated opioid use disorder treatment initiations and prevented opioid overdoses for this population. These flexibilities may have particularly enhanced treatment initiations for rural residents, given relaxed in-person methadone treatment requirements. Leveraging the Massachusetts Department of Public Health's Public Health Data Warehouse, we assessed whether the Massachusetts take-home methadone policy was associated with changes in post-release initiations of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (i.e., methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone) and opioid overdoses among recently released people, including rural residents. Results show that the monthly initiation rate of any MOUD within 7 days of release did not change after the policy. However, when disaggregating by MOUDs, we find a trend divergence, with increases in methadone offsetting decreases in other MOUDs. After the policy, the monthly rate of methadone initiations increased significantly. By contrast, the monthly rate of buprenorphine initiations decreased, and the monthly rate of extended-release naltrexone initiations remained stable. These patterns generally held among rural residents, who experienced significantly higher methadone initiation rates relative to urban residents after the policy. Furthermore, in contrast to increased opioid overdose rates in Massachusetts and the United States during the pandemic, the monthly adjusted rate of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdoses within 90 days of release remained stable. These findings suggest that take-home methadone flexibilities may facilitate methadone initiations for recently incarcerated individuals, particularly rural residents, and potentially prevent opioid overdoses.
阿片类药物过量是近期被监禁人群死亡的主要原因。在新冠疫情初期采用的带回家美沙酮灵活性措施,可能促进了阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的启动,并预防了该人群的阿片类药物过量情况。鉴于放宽了面对面美沙酮治疗要求,这些灵活性措施可能尤其提高了农村居民的治疗启动率。利用马萨诸塞州公共卫生部的公共卫生数据仓库,我们评估了马萨诸塞州的带回家美沙酮政策是否与近期获释人员(包括农村居民)释放后阿片类药物使用障碍药物(MOUD,即美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和长效纳曲酮)启动情况的变化以及阿片类药物过量情况相关。结果显示,政策实施后,释放后7天内任何MOUD的月启动率没有变化。然而,按MOUD进行分类时,我们发现了一种趋势差异,美沙酮启动率的增加抵消了其他MOUD启动率的下降。政策实施后,美沙酮启动的月率显著增加。相比之下,丁丙诺啡启动的月率下降,长效纳曲酮启动的月率保持稳定。这些模式在农村居民中普遍存在,政策实施后,农村居民的美沙酮启动率相对于城市居民显著更高。此外,与疫情期间马萨诸塞州和美国阿片类药物过量率上升形成对比的是,释放后90天内致命和非致命阿片类药物过量的月调整率保持稳定。这些发现表明,带回家美沙酮灵活性措施可能促进近期被监禁个体(尤其是农村居民)的美沙酮启动,并有可能预防阿片类药物过量。