• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
2
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.作为离散试验选择因素的强化概率与延迟
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.
3
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.延迟和概率性强化物的选择:变异性、试验间隔时间和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):513-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-513.
4
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.延迟和强化率对离散试验选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75.
5
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.概率性强化条件下的选择:延迟和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
6
A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.自我控制选择中的延迟与比率要求比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):305-15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-305.
7
Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.大鼠在一个和两个延迟强化物之间的选择。
Learn Behav. 2007 Aug;35(3):169-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03193052.
8
Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.条件性强化以及对延迟和不确定的初级强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):139-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-139.
9
Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.固定与可变强化延迟选择中的传递性测试。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):287-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-287.
10
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli.具有延迟和概率性强化物的选择:强化前和强化后刺激的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):253-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-253.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice Bundling Increases Valuation of Delayed Losses More Than Gains in Cigarette Smokers.选择捆绑对吸烟者延迟损失的估值提升幅度大于对延迟收益的估值提升幅度。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jan 13;15:796502. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.796502. eCollection 2021.
2
Choice bundling, unpacked: Observed and predicted effects on intertemporal choice in an additive model of hyperbolic delay discounting.选择捆绑,拆开:在双曲线时距折扣的加性模型中对跨期选择的观察和预测效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0259830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259830. eCollection 2021.
3
Willpower with and without effort.意志力:有无付出努力的区别。
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 26;44:e30. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000357.
4
Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.通过为获得奖励性脑电刺激而工作的大鼠对机会成本进行评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0182120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182120. eCollection 2017.
5
The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making.认知努力在主观奖励贬值和风险决策中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 20;5:16880. doi: 10.1038/srep16880.
6
Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?条件强化:被忽视或过时的解释性概念?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):457-75. doi: 10.3758/BF03210950.
7
Effects of reward bundling on male rats' preference for larger-later food rewards.奖励捆绑对雄性大鼠对更大后期食物奖励的偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):150-8. doi: 10.1002/jeab.11. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
8
Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.留到最后才是最好的?跨物种强化序列选择的分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jul;98(1):45-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-45.
9
Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.条件强化:实验与理论问题
Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;17(2):261-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03392675.
10
Risky choice in pigeons and humans: a cross-species comparison.鸽子和人类的冒险选择:跨物种比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):27-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-27.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects on preference of reinforcement delay, number of reinforcers, and terminal-link duration.对强化时距、强化物数量和终末链时长的偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):255-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-255.
2
Choice and multiple reinforcers.选择和多种强化物。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):115-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-115.
3
Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate.食物传递的延迟或速率作为反应速率的决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):129-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-129.
4
Choice and number of reinforcers.强化物的选择和数量。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):51-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-51.
5
The correlation-based law of effect.基于关联的效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137.
6
A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.简单同时性和同时性链日程中的选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27.
7
Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.强化时间表的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):73-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-73.
8
On the law of effect.关于效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
9
Choice and rate of reinforcement.强化的选择和比率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):723-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723.
10
Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.对混合间隔与固定间隔时间表的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247.

单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。

Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.

作者信息

Mazur J E

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67
PMID:3746189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1348257/
Abstract

Pigeons chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A peck on a red key produced the same consequences on every trial within a condition, but between conditions the number of reinforcers varied from one to three and the reinforcer delays varied between 5 s and 30 s. A peck on a green key produced a delay of adjustable duration and then a single reinforcer. The green-key delay was increased or decreased many times per session, depending on a subject's previous choices, which permitted estimation of an indifference point, or a delay at which a subject chose each alternative about equally often. The indifference points decreased systematically with more red-key reinforcers and with shorter red-key delays. The results did not support the suggestion of Moore (1979) that multiple delayed reinforcers have no effect on preference unless they are closely grouped. The results were well described in quantitative detail by a simple model stating that each of a series of reinforcers increases preference, but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. The success of this model, which considers only delay of reinforcement, suggested that the overall rate of reinforcement for each alternative had no effect on choice between those alternatives.

摘要

鸽子在不同强化物数量和每个强化物延迟时间不同的选项之间进行选择。在一种条件下,每次啄红色按键所产生的后果在每次试验中都是相同的,但在不同条件下,强化物的数量从一个到三个不等,强化物的延迟时间在5秒到30秒之间变化。啄绿色按键会产生一个持续时间可调节的延迟,然后是一个单一强化物。绿色按键的延迟时间在每次试验中会根据实验对象之前的选择多次增加或减少,这使得能够估计出无差异点,即实验对象选择每个选项的频率大致相同的延迟时间。随着红色按键强化物数量的增加和红色按键延迟时间的缩短,无差异点会系统性地降低。结果并不支持摩尔(1979年)的观点,即多个延迟强化物除非紧密分组,否则对偏好没有影响。一个简单的模型对结果进行了详细的定量描述,该模型指出一系列强化物中的每一个都会增加偏好,但强化物的效果与其延迟时间成反比。这个仅考虑强化延迟的模型的成功表明,每个选项的总体强化率对这些选项之间的选择没有影响。