Horii Takeshi, Kawaguchi Marina, Ikegami Yuichi, Oikawa Yoichi, Shimada Akira, Mihara Kiyosi
Department of Pharmacy, Musashino University, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Jul 17;13(4):e005103. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005103.
Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) represents a significant atherosclerotic complication in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and metformin are commonly prescribed glucose-lowering agents that have demonstrated potential benefits in attenuating atherosclerosis progression. This study examined the impact of SGLT2is and metformin on the risk of developing severe LEAD in elderly patients with T2D.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed insurance data for individuals aged 65 years and older with advanced-age health insurance coverage, using health insurance claims and self-reported health check-up data. The observation start date was the initial prescription date of SGLT2is or metformin. Severe LEAD was defined as cases requiring revascularization after a LEAD diagnosis. We conducted a 3-year analysis using propensity score matching to compare the distinct effects of each drug on LEAD risk using a claims database.
The final population comprised 31,732 new SGLT2i and metformin users, divided into two groups (n=15,866 patients each). LEAD incidence rates were 2.10 and 2.69 per 1,000 person-years for metformin and SGLT2is, respectively. Compared with metformin, SGLT2is showed a higher HR for severe LEAD, especially in patients with a diastolic blood pressure (dBP) below 80 mm Hg (HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.30) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m (HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.94).
The endothelial benefits of metformin, achieved without affecting hemodynamics, may be particularly effective in elderly patients with T2D and low dBP or impaired renal function. However, the presence of cardiovascular disease may often lead to the selection of SGLT2is. Nevertheless, prioritizing the use of metformin may be prudent when considering LEAD status.
下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)是2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中一种重要的动脉粥样硬化并发症。钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和二甲双胍是常用的降糖药物,已显示出在减缓动脉粥样硬化进展方面的潜在益处。本研究探讨了SGLT2i和二甲双胍对老年T2D患者发生严重LEAD风险的影响。
这项回顾性队列研究利用健康保险理赔数据和自我报告的健康检查数据,分析了65岁及以上拥有高龄医疗保险的个人的保险数据。观察起始日期为SGLT2i或二甲双胍的初始处方日期。严重LEAD定义为在LEAD诊断后需要进行血管重建的病例。我们使用倾向评分匹配进行了为期3年的分析,以使用理赔数据库比较每种药物对LEAD风险的不同影响。
最终人群包括31,732名新使用SGLT2i和二甲双胍的患者,分为两组(每组n = 15,866例患者)。二甲双胍和SGLT2i的LEAD发病率分别为每1000人年2.10例和2.69例。与二甲双胍相比,SGLT2i在严重LEAD方面显示出更高的风险比(HR),特别是在舒张压(dBP)低于80 mmHg的患者中(HR:2.11;95%置信区间:1.01至2.30)以及估计肾小球滤过率在30至60 mL/min/1.73 m²之间的患者中(HR:2.32;95%置信区间:1.09至2.94)。
二甲双胍在不影响血流动力学的情况下对内皮的益处,可能在老年T2D且dBP低或肾功能受损的患者中特别有效。然而,心血管疾病的存在可能常常导致选择SGLT2i。尽管如此,在考虑LEAD状况时优先使用二甲双胍可能是谨慎的。