Mezzich J E, Fabrega H, Mezzich A C, Coffman G A
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985 Dec;173(12):738-41. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198512000-00005.
The authors investigated various aspects of the international use of and experience with DSM-III through a consultation by mail sponsored by the World Psychiatric Association. The respondents were 175 expert diagnosticians nominated as such by the national psychiatric associations of 52 countries spanning all continents. The United States diagnostic system was used by 72% of the participants, only slightly less than the internationally official International Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, ninth revision (ICD-9) (77%). Furthermore, DSM-III was perceived to be considerably more useful than the current international classification manual. The leading difficulties encountered with DSM-III involved problematic boundaries or definitions of diagnostic categories and the lack of suitable categories in some cases. The most frequent recommendations offered for the advancement of diagnostic systems included the improvement of patient evaluation procedures, the greater use and refinement of multiaxial diagnosis, and the empirical validation of diagnostic systems.
作者们通过世界精神病学协会发起的邮件咨询,对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)在国际上的使用情况及经验的各个方面进行了调查。受访者是来自五大洲52个国家的国家精神病学协会提名的175名专家诊断师。72%的参与者使用了美国的诊断系统,仅略低于国际官方的《疾病、损伤和死因国际分类》第九版(ICD - 9)(77%)。此外,DSM - III被认为比当前的国际分类手册有用得多。使用DSM - III遇到的主要困难包括诊断类别的界限或定义存在问题,以及在某些情况下缺乏合适的类别。为改进诊断系统提出的最常见建议包括改进患者评估程序、更多地使用和完善多轴诊断以及对诊断系统进行实证验证。