Maser J D, Kaelber C, Weise R E
Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):271-9. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.271.
A survey of the uses and attitudes of 146 mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists and psychologists, in 42 countries (not including the United States) toward the 3rd edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) and its revision (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1980,1987) is reported. The results revealed wide-spread endorsement of the multiaxial system, theoretical neutrality, descriptive symptom criteria forming discrete categories, and the placement of personality disorders on a separate axis. We report that the DSM-III and DSM-III-R are more widely used around the world than the International Classification of Diseases for teaching, research, and clinical practice. Opinions about various dimensions of the DSM's usefulness and shortcomings are presented.
本文报告了一项针对42个国家(不包括美国)的146名心理健康专业人员(主要是精神科医生和心理学家)对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及其修订版(DSM-III-R;美国精神病学协会,1980年、1987年)的使用情况和态度的调查。结果显示,多轴系统、理论中立性、形成离散类别的描述性症状标准以及将人格障碍置于单独轴上得到了广泛认可。我们报告称,在教学、研究和临床实践中,DSM-III和DSM-III-R在全球的使用比《国际疾病分类》更为广泛。文中还呈现了关于DSM实用性和缺点各个方面的意见。