Williams J B, Spitzer R L
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;39(11):1283-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290110039007.
For several years the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) have been used widely by investigators to select and describe research subjects. These criteria were used as the initial basis for the specified diagnostic criteria for the major diagnostic categories of DSM-III. With the availability of DSM-III in early 1980, research investigators involved in ongoing studies using the RDC and those planning future studies need to understand the relationship between these two systems so that they can make an informed decision about the use of these systems in their work. We compared each of the RDC categories with the corresponding DSM-III categories and determined major differences in the way the systems define many of the categories and the reasons form these differences. We delineated some of the issues that need to be considered when making decisions about which sets of criteria to use in research studies.
数年来,研究诊断标准(RDC)被研究者广泛用于选择和描述研究对象。这些标准被用作《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)主要诊断类别的特定诊断标准的初始基础。随着1980年初DSM - III的问世,参与正在进行的使用RDC研究的研究者以及计划未来研究的人员需要了解这两个系统之间的关系,以便他们能够在工作中就是否使用这些系统做出明智的决定。我们将RDC的每个类别与相应的DSM - III类别进行了比较,并确定了这两个系统在定义许多类别方式上的主要差异以及造成这些差异的原因。我们阐述了在决定研究中使用哪套标准时需要考虑的一些问题。