Delbecque Laure, Zschocke Juergen, Ding Ding, Poon Jiat-Ling, Alonzo Carolina, Pérez Nancy Gabriela, Myrick Shane, Hill Jennifer N
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
IQVIA, New York, NY, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00777-z.
To identify and describe patient experience data (PED)-related guidance issued by regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
National agency websites were manually searched (October 2021, updated October-December 2023) to identify standalone PED guidance, and general submission/clinical trial or disease-specific guidance in four therapy areas, including PED-related recommendations. Identified documents were reviewed for requirements/expectations on types of PED; concepts of interest and instruments/tools; validation, analysis, and interpretation; study design, and endpoint definitions.
A total of 34 regulatory and 21 HTA documents were reviewed across 7 and 11 agencies, respectively. Most regulatory agencies expected data collected via clinical outcome assessments; concepts of interest were similar; specific tools were not usually recommended, although the use of validated instruments was expected; and meaningful within-patient change was generally considered key to interpretation. HTA guidance on PED varied primarily based on country requirement for utility estimates to inform economic evaluation (little/no guidance beyond the concept of interest) versus interest in PED on signs, symptoms, or disease impact on functioning (generally more comprehensive details on PED expectations).
Through PED, patient voice is an increasingly important factor in regulatory, access, and reimbursement decision-making. Regulatory and HTA agencies in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific have varying expectations regarding PED. This misalignment can necessitate the collection of multiple types of PED to meet all requirements (resulting in complex clinical trial protocols and significant patient burden), and lead to differences in data interpretation or gaps in the expected data. Therefore, PED measurement standards should be harmonized globally, and the collection of required PED should be ensured early during drug development to ensure decisions can be made based on valid and reliable data.
识别并描述北美、欧洲和亚太地区监管机构及卫生技术评估(HTA)机构发布的与患者体验数据(PED)相关的指南。
人工检索国家机构网站(2021年10月,2023年10月至12月更新),以识别独立的PED指南,以及四个治疗领域的一般提交/临床试验或疾病特定指南,包括与PED相关的建议。对识别出的文件进行审查,以了解关于PED类型的要求/期望;感兴趣的概念和工具;验证、分析和解释;研究设计以及终点定义。
分别对7个和11个机构的34份监管文件和21份HTA文件进行了审查。大多数监管机构期望通过临床结局评估收集数据;感兴趣的概念相似;虽然期望使用经过验证的工具,但通常不推荐特定工具;有意义的患者内变化通常被认为是解释的关键。HTA关于PED的指南主要因国家对效用估计以进行经济评估的要求而异(除感兴趣的概念外几乎没有/没有指南),与对PED在体征、症状或疾病对功能影响方面的兴趣不同(关于PED期望的细节通常更全面)。
通过PED,患者声音在监管、准入和报销决策中日益成为重要因素。北美、欧洲和亚太地区的监管机构和HTA机构对PED有不同期望。这种不一致可能需要收集多种类型的PED以满足所有要求(导致复杂的临床试验方案和患者负担加重),并导致数据解释的差异或预期数据的差距。因此,应在全球范围内统一PED测量标准,并在药物研发早期确保收集所需的PED,以确保能够基于有效和可靠的数据做出决策。