Pereira Lucas Dourado Mapurunga, Barreira Márcio Alencar, de Saboia Mont'Alverne Thiago Nepomuceno, Maia Marina Marques, de Castro Marcela Alina Jereissati, de Oliveira Joao Wallace Carvalho, Maia Mariana Marques, de Vasconcelos Paulo Roberto Cavalcante, de Oliveira Alessandrino Terceiro
Department of Digestive Endoscopy, General Hospital of Fortaleza, Fortaleza 60150-160, Ceará, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Dr. José Frota Institute, Fortaleza 60025-061, Ceará, Brazil.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):106352. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.106352.
Foreign body (FB) ingestion is one of the most challenging clinical situations faced by endoscopists. Most esophageal FB impaction emergencies occur in children. It is important to study the epidemiological profile and endoscopic methods for treating FB impacted in the esophagus of children, as it can help in the development of more effective, safe and personalized preventive and therapeutic strategies.
To define the profile of children seeking emergency care due to FB impaction in the esophagus, analyze factors associated with complications, and evaluate the effectiveness of rigid (RE) and flexible endoscopes (FE).
A retrospective cohort study of 166 children with impacted FB in the esophagus who underwent an endoscopy (FE = 84 RE = 82) at the Dr. José Frota Institute was performed. The primary outcomes were to assess the efficacy of the endoscopic technique and factors associated with complications. The secondary outcomes were age group, gender, symptoms, length of hospital stay, and location of the FB.
Boys (66.9%), preschoolers (43.4%), FB > 24 hours (62.7%), cervical esophagus (60.8%), coin ingestion (57.2%) and complaints of dysphagia (24.9%) and sialorrhea (23.1%) were the predominant findings. Endoscopy was successful (90.4%) with sedation (89.1%). A total of 97% of patients were discharged from the hospital, while 3% died. The average hospital stay length was 2.6 days. Most patients did not experience complications predominated (64.5%). Esophageal perforations were more frequent after RE (11% 4.8%), while FE was more effective (95.2% 85.4%). The test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. For continuous variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test or analysis of variance was used. Statistical analyses were performed in R software (version 1.3.1093).
Coins were the most frequent FBs and were mainly lodged in the upper esophagus of preschool boys. Risk factors for complications due to esophageal FB include battery ingestion, delayed removal (> 48 hours) and lodging in the thoracic esophagus. FE was generally more effective than RE for removing FBs; both procedures are safe.
异物吞食是内镜医师面临的最具挑战性的临床情况之一。大多数食管异物嵌顿紧急情况发生在儿童身上。研究儿童食管异物嵌顿的流行病学特征和内镜治疗方法很重要,因为这有助于制定更有效、安全和个性化的预防及治疗策略。
确定因食管异物嵌顿寻求急诊治疗的儿童特征,分析与并发症相关的因素,并评估硬质内镜(RE)和柔性内镜(FE)的有效性。
对166例在若泽·弗罗塔博士研究所接受内镜检查(FE = 84例,RE = 82例)的食管异物嵌顿儿童进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局是评估内镜技术的疗效和与并发症相关的因素。次要结局是年龄组、性别、症状、住院时间和异物位置。
主要发现为男孩(66.9%)、学龄前儿童(43.4%)、异物存留>24小时(62.7%)、颈段食管(60.8%)、吞食硬币(57.2%)以及吞咽困难主诉(24.9%)和流涎(23.1%)。在内镜检查中,使用镇静剂时成功率为(90.4%),其中89.1%使用了镇静剂。共有97%的患者出院,3%死亡。平均住院时间为2.6天。大多数患者未发生并发症(占64.5%)。RE术后食管穿孔更常见(11%对4.8%),而FE更有效(95.2%对85.4%)。采用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验比较分类变量。对于连续变量,采用克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验或方差分析。统计分析在R软件(版本1.3.1093)中进行。
硬币是最常见的异物,主要嵌顿在学龄前男孩的上段食管。食管异物导致并发症的危险因素包括吞食电池、延迟取出(>48小时)和嵌顿在胸段食管。一般来说,FE在取出异物方面比RE更有效;两种方法都很安全。