Manfredi Giulia Francesca, Fulgenzi Claudia Angela Maria, Celsa Ciro, Stefanini Bernardo, D'Alessio Antonio, Pinter Matthias, Scheiner Bernhard, Awosika Nichola, Brunetti Leonardo, Lombardi Pasquale, Latchford Charles, Lee Pei-Chang, Huang Yi-Hsiang, Lin Chun-Yen, Dalbeni Andrea, Vogel Arndt, Galle Peter R, Kudo Masatoshi, Rimassa Lorenza, Chon Hong Jae, Cabibbo Giuseppe, Piscaglia Fabio, Cammà Calogero, Pillai Anjana, Pirisi Mario, Singal Amit G, Pinato David J
Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
JHEP Rep. 2025 Apr 22;7(8):101431. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101431. eCollection 2025 Aug.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) is a standard-of-care treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Verification of its effectiveness outside clinical trials is an area of unmet need, especially in estimating long-term survival outcomes.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries to evaluate therapy outcomes in patients treated with frontline A+B for uHCC outside trials. Pooled estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 and 12 months were calculated from individual patient-level data using random-effects analysis.
Of 2,179 patients selected from 12 cohorts, 80.5% were male, median age was 66 years (IQR 61.6-73.0), 61.6% had advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 83.6% were Child-Pugh (CP) class A. Pooled 6- and 12-month OS was 82% (95% CI: 76-86%; = 80%) and 65% (95% CI: 60-70%; = 66%). Median OS of patients with CP-A liver function was 20.9 months (95% CI: 15.7-20.9), consistent with IMbrave150 estimates (19.2 months, 95% CI: 17.0-23.7, = 0.58). Pooled PFS at 6 and 12 months was 57% (95% CI: 53-61%; = 49%) and 35% (95% CI: 31-39%, = 60%). Among patients with longer follow-up, the OS (n = 1,783) and PFS (n = 959) rates were 52% (95% CI: 46-58; = 90%) and 26% (95% CI: 17-37; = 91%) at 18 months, respectively. At 24 months, OS (n = 1,556) rate was 39% (95% CI: 31-49; = 90%) and PFS (n = 732) rate was 25% (95% CI: 12-45; = 95%).
The effectiveness of A+B after registration mirrors its efficacy estimates from clinical trial datasets. Long-term survival at 24 months can be achieved in up to 39% of patients with uHCC treated with A+B in routine clinical practice.
This study provides real-world evidence supporting the long-term efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, showing survival outcomes similar to those achieved in clinical trials. These findings are important for clinicians in supporting A+B as a frontline treatment, particularly for patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function. They also offer valuable insights for policymakers and researchers for optimising treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of potential variability in patient populations.
阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗(A+B)是不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)的标准治疗方案。在临床试验之外验证其有效性是一个尚未满足的需求领域,尤其是在估计长期生存结果方面。
我们对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估在试验之外接受一线A+B治疗的uHCC患者的治疗结果。使用随机效应分析从个体患者水平数据计算6个月和12个月时的总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的合并估计值。
从12个队列中选出的2179例患者中,80.5%为男性,中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距61.6 - 73.0),61.6%患有晚期肝细胞癌(HCC),83.6%为Child-Pugh(CP)A类。6个月和12个月时的合并OS分别为82%(95%置信区间:76 - 86%;I² = 80%)和65%(95%置信区间:60 - 70%;I² = 66%)。CP-A肝功能患者的中位OS为20.9个月(95%置信区间:15.7 - 20.9),与IMbrave150的估计值(19.2个月,95%置信区间:17.0 - 23.7,P = 0.58)一致。6个月和12个月时的合并PFS分别为57%(95%置信区间:53 - 61%;I² = 49%)和35%(95%置信区间:31 - 39%,I² = 60%)。在随访时间较长的患者中,18个月时的OS(n = 1783)率和PFS(n = 959)率分别为52%(95%置信区间:46 - 58;I² = 90%)和26%(95%置信区间:17 - 37;I² = 91%)。24个月时,OS(n = 1556)率为39%(95%置信区间:31 - 49;I² = 90%),PFS(n = 732)率为25%(95%置信区间:12 - 45;I² = 95%)。
注册后A+B的有效性反映了其在临床试验数据集中的疗效估计值。在常规临床实践中,接受A+B治疗的uHCC患者中,高达39%的患者可实现24个月的长期生存。
本研究提供了真实世界证据,支持阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗(A+B)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的长期疗效,显示出与临床试验中相似的生存结果。这些发现对于临床医生支持将A+B作为一线治疗方案具有重要意义,特别是对于Child-Pugh A类肝功能的患者。它们也为政策制定者和研究人员优化不可切除肝细胞癌的治疗策略提供了有价值的见解。然而,由于患者群体可能存在变异性,结果应谨慎解释。