• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人肝移植中的风险评估与受者选择:一项混合方法调查。

Risk Evaluation and Recipient Selection in Adult Liver Transplantation: A Mixed-Methods Survey.

作者信息

Vincelette Christian, Mulongo Philémon, Giard Jeanne-Marie, Amzallag Éva, Carr Adrienne, Chaudhury Prosanto, Dajani Khaled, Fugère Réné, Gonzalez-Valencia Nelson, Joosten Alexandre, Kandelman Stanislas, Karvellas Constantine, McCluskey Stuart A, Özelsel Timur, Park Jeieung, Simoneau Ève, Trottier Helen, Chassé Michaël, Carrier François Martin

机构信息

Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Postdoctoral Studies, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Can Liver J. 2024 Aug 28;7(3):352-367. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2023-0037. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.3138/canlivj-2023-0037
PMID:40677772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12269329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant (LT) is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease. Limited resources and important post-operative implications for recipients compel judicious risk stratification and patient selection. However, little is known about the factors influencing physicians' assessment regarding patient selection for LT and risk evaluation.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey involving Canadian hepatologists, anesthesiologists, LT surgeons, and French anesthesiologists. The survey contained quantitative questions and a vignette-based qualitative substudy about risk assessment and patient selection for LT. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analyses were used.

RESULTS

We obtained answers from 129 physicians, and 63 participated in the qualitative substudy. We observed considerable variability in risk assessment prior to LT and identified many factors perceived to increase the risk of complications. Clinicians reported that the acceptable incidence of at least 1 severe post-operative complication for a LT program was 20% (95% CI: 20-30%). They identified the presence of any comorbidity as increasing the risk of different post-operative complications, especially acute kidney injury and cardiovascular complications. Frailty and functional disorders, severity of the liver disease, renal failure and cardiovascular comorbidities prior to LT emerged as important risk factors for post-operative morbidity. Most respondents were willing to pursue LT in patients with grade III acute-on-chronic liver failure but were less often willing to do so when faced with the uncertainty of a clinical example.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians had a heterogeneous appraisal of the post-operative risk of complications following LT, as well as factors considered in risk assessment.

摘要

背景

肝移植(LT)是终末期肝病的确定性治疗方法。资源有限以及对受者术后的重要影响促使进行明智的风险分层和患者选择。然而,关于影响医生对LT患者选择评估和风险评估的因素知之甚少。

方法

我们对加拿大肝病学家、麻醉学家、LT外科医生和法国麻醉学家进行了一项混合方法的横断面调查。该调查包含定量问题以及一项基于病例的关于LT风险评估和患者选择的定性子研究。采用描述性统计和定性内容分析。

结果

我们获得了129名医生的答复,63人参与了定性子研究。我们观察到LT术前风险评估存在很大差异,并确定了许多被认为会增加并发症风险的因素。临床医生报告说,一个LT项目中至少发生1种严重术后并发症的可接受发生率为20%(95%CI:20 - 30%)。他们认为任何合并症的存在都会增加不同术后并发症的风险,尤其是急性肾损伤和心血管并发症。LT术前的虚弱和功能障碍、肝病严重程度、肾衰竭和心血管合并症是术后发病的重要危险因素。大多数受访者愿意为III级慢加急性肝衰竭患者进行LT,但面对临床实例的不确定性时,愿意这样做的情况较少。

结论

临床医生对LT术后并发症的风险以及风险评估中考虑的因素评估存在异质性。

相似文献

1
Risk Evaluation and Recipient Selection in Adult Liver Transplantation: A Mixed-Methods Survey.成人肝移植中的风险评估与受者选择:一项混合方法调查。
Can Liver J. 2024 Aug 28;7(3):352-367. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2023-0037. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.性别作为肾移植后同种异体移植及患者相关预后的预测因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraoperative Vasoactive Medications and Perioperative Outcomes in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analyses.肝移植术中血管活性药物与围手术期结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Transplantation. 2024 Apr 1;108(4):854-873. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004744. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.肝移植围手术期临床实践:横断面调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;70(7):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02499-y. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report: Liver.OPTN/SRTR 2021 年度数据报告:肝脏。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Feb;23(2 Suppl 1):S178-S263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.006.
4
The impact of acute kidney injury with or without recovery on long-term kidney outcome in patients undergoing living liver transplantation.急性肾损伤伴或不伴恢复对活体肝移植患者长期肾脏结局的影响。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Jul 31;38(8):1817-1822. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad005.
5
Increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes among patients evaluated for liver transplantation in a Swiss tertiary referral center: a 10-year retrospective analysis.瑞士一家三级转诊中心接受肝移植评估患者中肥胖和糖尿病患病率的上升:一项10年回顾性分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Mar 1;152:w30138. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30138. eCollection 2022 Feb 28.
6
Peri-operative risk factors of chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation.肝移植后慢性肾脏病的围手术期风险因素。
J Nephrol. 2022 Mar;35(2):607-617. doi: 10.1007/s40620-021-01127-6. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
7
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Transplantation: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations.肝移植围手术期护理指南:术后加速康复(ERAS)建议
Transplantation. 2022 Mar 1;106(3):552-561. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003808.
8
Cardiac Risk Assessment in Liver Transplant Candidates: Current Controversies and Future Directions.肝移植候选人的心脏风险评估:当前的争议和未来方向。
Hepatology. 2021 Jun;73(6):2564-2576. doi: 10.1002/hep.31647.
9
Liver Transplantation in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.急性肝衰竭的肝移植。
Transplantation. 2021 Jul 1;105(7):1471-1481. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003550.
10
Thirty-day readmission rates, trends and its impact on liver transplantation recipients: a national analysis.30 天再入院率、趋势及其对肝移植受者的影响:一项全国性分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 6;10(1):19254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76396-5.