Wang Zhijun, Hu Jinsheng, Qiang Qi, Liu Zhihong, Yang Qingshuo
School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 3;16:1528316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1528316. eCollection 2025.
Cognitive control deficits are considered as central features of cognitive impairments in depression. The dual mechanisms of control (DMC)-proactive and reactive control-can further elucidate the nature of these deficits. However, evidence regarding proactive control in mild depression remains uncertain. This study investigated alterations of DMC and their related neural correlates in subthreshold depression (SD).
Participants with SD were identified through a mental health screening and assigned to the SD group ( = 27), while healthy controls (HC) without depressive symptoms were recruited as the control group ( = 28). All participants completed the AX-Continuous Performance Task while measuring behavioral (reaction time and accuracy) and electrophysiological responses (cue-P3 and probe-N2/P3). The primary outcome focused on the alteration of proactive control in individuals with SD, assessed through group differences in BX performance and the cue-P3 component. Secondary outcomes encompassed AY trial performance and probe-N2/P3 components, indexing reactive control alteration in individuals with SD.
Slower responses in BX and BY trials were observed for the SD relative to the HC group, indicating the impairment of context processing in individuals with SD. Event-related potential (ERP) results showed that cue-P3 components were less positive for the SD group relative to the HC group, indicating reduced cue utilization and attentional allocation to the cue in individuals with SD. Moreover, the positive correlation between the probe-N2 component and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores implies that individuals with SD may rely more on reactive control.
These findings suggest proactive control deficits in individuals with SD, as evidenced by diminished attentional allocation to the cue and inefficient cue utilization.
认知控制缺陷被视为抑郁症认知障碍的核心特征。控制的双重机制(DMC)——主动控制和反应控制——可以进一步阐明这些缺陷的本质。然而,关于轻度抑郁症中主动控制的证据仍不明确。本研究调查了阈下抑郁症(SD)中DMC及其相关神经关联的改变。
通过心理健康筛查确定患有SD的参与者,并将其分配到SD组(n = 27),同时招募无抑郁症状的健康对照(HC)作为对照组(n = 28)。所有参与者完成AX连续性能任务,同时测量行为(反应时间和准确性)和电生理反应(线索P3和探测N2/P3)。主要结果集中在患有SD的个体中主动控制的改变,通过BX表现和线索P3成分的组间差异进行评估。次要结果包括AY试验表现和探测N2/P3成分,指示患有SD的个体中反应控制的改变。
与HC组相比,SD组在BX和BY试验中的反应较慢,表明患有SD的个体的情境处理受损。事件相关电位(ERP)结果显示,与HC组相比,SD组的线索P3成分阳性较少,表明患有SD的个体对线索的利用减少且注意力分配减少。此外,探测N2成分与贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分之间的正相关意味着患有SD的个体可能更多地依赖反应控制。
这些发现表明患有SD的个体存在主动控制缺陷,注意力对线索的分配减少和线索利用效率低下证明了这一点。