Haller N, Exner J E
J Pers Assess. 1985 Oct;49(5):516-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4905_9.
Fifty newly admitted patients presenting symptoms of depression and/or helplessness were recruited to participate in a study concerning depression and randomized into two groups. Rorschachs were administered shortly after admission and then three or four days later. The subjects in the experimental group were instructed to give responses different than they had in the first test. Approximately two-thirds of the responses given by the experimental group in test 2 were different from those in test 1, whereas the control subjects repeated 66% of their test 1 answers in test 2. Retest correlations for 28 variables critical to interpretation show that the two groups differed significantly for four. The retest correlations for four of five variables often used as indices of depressive features were significantly high for both groups. Unusual findings are noted in the retest correlations for FM and m for the Control group and questions are raised concerning the modest retest correlations for CF and C + Cn versus the more commonplace summation of CF + C.
招募了50名新入院且表现出抑郁和/或无助症状的患者参与一项关于抑郁症的研究，并将他们随机分为两组。入院后不久及随后三四天进行了罗夏墨迹测验。实验组的受试者被要求给出与第一次测试不同的回答。在第二次测试中，实验组给出的回答约有三分之二与第一次测试不同，而对照组受试者在第二次测试中重复了66%第一次测试的答案。对28个对解释至关重要的变量进行的重测相关性分析表明，两组在四个变量上存在显著差异。两组中经常用作抑郁特征指标的五个变量中的四个变量的重测相关性都非常高。对照组在FM和m的重测相关性方面有不寻常的发现，同时也对CF和C + Cn相对较低的重测相关性与更常见的CF + C总和提出了疑问。
