Hoebink Max, Jongkind Vincent
Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Vascular Surgery, Maelsonstraat 3, Hoorn, the Netherlands.
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2025 Apr 2;64:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2025.01.005. eCollection 2025.
Peri-procedural antithrombotics are used extensively to prevent thromboembolic complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence to support recommendations on antithrombotic strategies, possibly leading to substantial variation in local practices. A comprehensive overview of antithrombotic strategies is needed to identify the most widely accepted protocols employed during NCAP, highlight variations in local practices, and identify new research targets to establish evidence based peri-procedural anticoagulation management.
An international, web based survey study was conducted from March to October 2023, targeting vascular clinical specialists who applied antithrombotic strategies during NCAP in daily practice.
The survey was completed by 436 vascular clinical specialists from 45 countries (Europeans: 93%, vascular surgeons or vascular surgery residents: 98%). Systemic unfractionated heparin was used by nearly all vascular specialists during all procedures (varying between 98-99%, depending on the procedure type), but could vary depending on specific NCAP. A fixed starting dose (39-52%, most often 5 000 IU [80-89%]) or an actual bodyweight dependent dose (42-52%, most commonly 100 IU/kg [40-67%] or 50 IU/kg [17-40%]) was mainly used. Except during fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair procedures (51%), activated clotting time (ACT) was employed by a minority (26-31%). A large variety in measurement protocols was observed, yet a target ACT of 200 seconds was most often used for all NCAP types (44-54%). Most vascular specialists considered a heparin follow up dose (61-81%) and heparin reversal using protamine (54-63%), both for a variety of indications. Of the participants, 68% expressed discontent with their current antithrombotic protocol(s).
This comprehensive, international survey study revealed large variation among vascular clinical specialists' heparinisation strategies during NCAP. Together with the considerable discontent expressed regarding protocols, this emphasises the urgent need for comparative, randomised studies on antithrombotic management during NCAP.
围手术期抗栓药物在全球范围内广泛用于预防非心脏动脉手术(NCAP)期间的血栓栓塞并发症。然而,缺乏证据支持抗栓策略的推荐,这可能导致各地实践存在很大差异。需要对抗栓策略进行全面概述,以确定NCAP期间使用最广泛的方案,突出各地实践的差异,并确定新的研究目标,以建立基于证据的围手术期抗凝管理。
2023年3月至10月进行了一项基于网络的国际调查研究,目标是在日常实践中对NCAP应用抗栓策略的血管临床专家。
来自45个国家的436名血管临床专家完成了调查(欧洲人:93%,血管外科医生或血管外科住院医师:98%)。几乎所有血管专家在所有手术中都使用普通肝素(根据手术类型不同,在98%-99%之间),但可能因特定的NCAP而有所不同。主要使用固定起始剂量(39%-52%,最常见的是5000 IU [80%-89%])或根据实际体重计算的剂量(42%-52%,最常见的是100 IU/kg [40%-67%]或50 IU/kg [17%-40%])。除了开窗或分支型血管内动脉瘤修复手术期间(51%),少数人(26%-31%)采用活化凝血时间(ACT)。观察到测量方案有很大差异,但所有NCAP类型最常使用的ACT目标值为200秒(44%-54%)。大多数血管专家考虑使用肝素后续剂量(61%-81%)和使用鱼精蛋白进行肝素逆转(54%-63%),适用于多种适应症。68%的参与者对他们目前的抗栓方案表示不满。
这项全面的国际调查研究显示,血管临床专家在NCAP期间的肝素化策略存在很大差异。加上对方案表达的相当不满,这强调了迫切需要对NCAP期间的抗栓管理进行比较性随机研究。