Suppr超能文献

精神病学能否阻碍主体间性?对异常体验的生物医学概念化的现象学批判。

Can psychiatry hinder intersubjectivity? A phenomenological critique of the biomedical conceptualization of anomalous experience.

作者信息

Wantoch Sabina

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1505028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1505028. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of anomalous experiences. The term 'anomalous experience' refers to experiences often described as hallucinations and, more broadly, to the experiential dimensions of what is commonly referred to as psychosis. I present a critical analysis of the dominant clinical conceptualization of anomalous experience, which frames it as a 'pathology of the mind', by focusing on how this assumption is experienced intersubjectively. Drawing on Ratcliffe's (2017) account of how intersubjectivity is implicated in anomalous experience, I argue that the psychiatric conceptualization of such experiences may obstruct intersubjective processes for those who undergo them. I suggest that this pathological marker, through its underlying assumptions and institutional practices associated with it, can give rise to a certain kind of relationality, characterized by an affective tone that excludes individuals from the shared interpersonal dynamics typically structuring experience in relation to a shared reality. Consequently, the psychiatric conceptualization of anomalous experience may play a role in the constitution of experiences of the kind that it seeks to erase. This implicates phenomenological psychopathology to question the starting assumptions that it takes as a given, direct picture of reality. Phenomenological psychopathology often adopts a pathological conceptualization of anomalous experience as its starting point, taking psychiatric concepts as given. I suggest that the discipline consider its own role, phenomenologically, in the multidirectional interactions that take place between anomalous experiences and the ways they are conceptualized and responded to. I propose that beginning with the direct experience itself, rather than its pathological association (and all the affective baggage this entails), would represent a progressive direction for the future of phenomenological psychopathology. This points toward critical phenomenology and critical phenomenological psychopathology.

摘要

本研究考察异常体验这一现象。“异常体验”一词通常指常被描述为幻觉的体验,更广泛地说,是指通常被称为精神病的体验维度。我对异常体验的主流临床概念化进行了批判性分析,这种概念化将其视为一种“心理病理学”,重点关注这种假设在主体间是如何被体验的。借鉴拉特克利夫(2017年)关于主体间性如何与异常体验相关联的论述,我认为这种体验的精神病学概念化可能会阻碍经历这些体验的人的主体间过程。我认为,这种病理标记,通过其潜在假设以及与之相关的制度实践,可能会引发某种特定的关系,其特征是一种情感基调,将个体排除在通常构成与共享现实相关体验的共享人际动态之外。因此,异常体验的精神病学概念化可能在它试图消除的那种体验的构成中发挥作用。这意味着现象学精神病理学要质疑它视为既定的、对现实的直接描绘的起始假设。现象学精神病理学常常将异常体验的病理概念化作为其出发点,将精神病学概念视为既定。我建议该学科从现象学角度考虑自身在异常体验与其概念化及应对方式之间发生的多向互动中的作用。我提议从直接体验本身出发,而非其病理关联(以及由此带来的所有情感包袱),这将代表现象学精神病理学未来的一个进步方向。这指向批判现象学和批判现象学精神病理学。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验