• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于学术竞赛的学习培养医学生的科学素养,以提升其专业竞争力。

Academic competition-based learning cultivates scientific literacy to promote professional competitiveness in medical undergraduates.

作者信息

Ruan Yan, Zhang Junlei, Wang Jiali, Jian Rui, Mei Feng, Li Hongli, Zhang Yun, Hu Qiwen, Xiao Lan, Yang Yi, Li Ming, Xiong Jiaxiang, Tian Yanping

机构信息

Department of Histology and Embryology, College of Basic Medical Science, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Experimental Center of Basic Medicine, College of Basic Medical Science, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;13:1590832. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590832. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590832
PMID:40678633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12267259/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary healthcare requires medical professionals with advanced scientific literacy. Current undergraduate medical curricula may not consistently develop this critical skillset. This study evaluates the effectiveness and challenges of an academic competition-based learning (ACBL) for enhancing scientific literacy in medical undergraduates.

METHODS

The International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition based program was developed using a two-round modified Delphi study. 30 students participated in an iGEM-based academic competition during 18 months. Scientific literacy domains were assessed through validated questionnaires during a five-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

iGEM participants demonstrated significantly greater improvement in literature review, experimental design, technical execution, presentation skills, and research management compared to controls ( < 0.01). Significant gains were observed in scientific knowledge acquisition and scientific reasoning ( < 0.01). Scores for active learning, critical thinking, and collaborative communication were significantly higher in the iGEM group ( < 0.05). Participants identified laboratory resources, space, equipment and funding as primary implementation constraints.

CONCLUSION

ACBL is an innovative and effective strategies to develop students' scientific literacy for professional competitiveness, which highlights the potential of ACBL as a transformative approach in medical education.

摘要

背景

当代医疗保健需要具备先进科学素养的医学专业人员。当前的本科医学课程可能无法始终如一地培养这一关键技能集。本研究评估了基于学术竞赛的学习(ACBL)在提高医学本科生科学素养方面的有效性和挑战。

方法

基于国际基因工程机器大赛(iGEM)的项目是通过两轮改进的德尔菲研究开发的。30名学生在18个月内参加了基于iGEM的学术竞赛。在五年的随访期内,通过经过验证的问卷对科学素养领域进行评估。

结果

与对照组相比,iGEM参与者在文献综述、实验设计、技术执行、展示技能和研究管理方面表现出显著更大的进步(<0.01)。在科学知识获取和科学推理方面观察到显著提高(<0.01)。iGEM组在主动学习、批判性思维和协作沟通方面的得分显著更高(<0.05)。参与者将实验室资源、空间、设备和资金确定为主要实施限制因素。

结论

ACBL是一种创新且有效的策略,可培养学生的科学素养以提升专业竞争力,这凸显了ACBL作为医学教育变革性方法的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/2405f91a9be9/fpubh-13-1590832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/1182178cc3ab/fpubh-13-1590832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/158bc46e5f9b/fpubh-13-1590832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/2405f91a9be9/fpubh-13-1590832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/1182178cc3ab/fpubh-13-1590832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/158bc46e5f9b/fpubh-13-1590832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d8/12267259/2405f91a9be9/fpubh-13-1590832-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Academic competition-based learning cultivates scientific literacy to promote professional competitiveness in medical undergraduates.基于学术竞赛的学习培养医学生的科学素养,以提升其专业竞争力。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;13:1590832. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590832. eCollection 2025.
2
Whether case-based teaching combined with the flipped classroom is more valuable than traditional lecture-based teaching methods in clinical medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在临床医学教育中,基于案例的教学与翻转课堂相结合是否比传统的基于讲座的教学方法更具价值:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07465-4.
3
Enhancing thai fifth-year medical students' knowledge and attitudes toward palliative care through active learning methods.通过主动学习方法增强泰国五年级医学生对姑息治疗的知识和态度。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07659-w.
4
Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.本科医学院校学习动机策略及其对学生反馈素养的影响:一项解释性序列混合方法研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 25;35(3):1345-1359. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Investigation of Learning and Employment Status in the Undergraduate Education of Speech Rehabilitation in Mainland China.中国大陆言语康复本科教育的学习与就业状况调查
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70087. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70087.
6
Impact of medical school on quality of life and mental health in Brazil: a cross-sectional comparative study.医学院对巴西生活质量和心理健康的影响:一项横断面比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097917.
7
Undergraduate medical students' perspectives on research education and their confidence in research skills: a cross-sectional study from Palestine.本科医学生对研究教育的看法及其对研究技能的信心:一项来自巴勒斯坦的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):1005. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07586-w.
8
The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review.本科护理专业学生学术素养的重要性及其与未来专业临床实践的关系:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
10
The effect of an interactive game-based e-book with simulative clinical scenarios on the health literacy competency among medical students in Taiwan.一款带有模拟临床场景的互动式电子书对台湾医学生健康素养能力的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07541-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the impact of Medical Education's Innovation & Entrepreneurship Program in China.评估中国医学教育创新与创业计划的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 10;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05467-2.
2
Development of an index system for the scientific literacy of medical staff: a modified Delphi study in China.开发医务人员科学素养评价指标体系:中国德尔菲法改良研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05350-0.
3
Effects of the Education and Training Programme for Excellent Physicians in China on medical students' academic performance: a cross-sectional study.
中国卓越医师教育培训项目对医学生学业成绩的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e072940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072940.
4
Survey analysis and discussion on cultivating scientific research quality among undergraduates in medical colleges.医学院本科生科研素质培养的调查分析与探讨
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Jun;11(3):e01095. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1095.
5
The reliability and validity of the training elements scale for clinicians in the new era--based on the perspective of Chinese doctors' job demands.新时代临床医生培训要素量表的信度和效度——基于中国医生工作需求的视角。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 2;23(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04289-y.
6
Thinking more wisely: using the Socratic method to develop critical thinking skills amongst healthcare students.更明智地思考:在医疗保健学生中使用苏格拉底法发展批判性思维技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2.
7
Evaluating and comparing critical thinking skills of residents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.评估和比较德黑兰医科大学住院医师的批判性思维技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04094-7.
8
[Development of the iGEM high school track].[国际基因工程机器大赛高中赛道的发展]
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2022 Dec 25;38(12):4816-4826. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.220448.
9
Medical students describe their wellness and how to preserve it.医学生描述他们的健康状况和如何保持健康。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 28;22(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03552-y.
10
Core competencies for a biomedical laboratory scientist - a Delphi study.生物医学实验室科学家的核心能力——德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03509-1.