• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.本科医学院校学习动机策略及其对学生反馈素养的影响:一项解释性序列混合方法研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 25;35(3):1345-1359. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Surveying Undergraduate Medical Students' Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies in the First and Last Year of Medical School.调查医学院本科一、四年级学生的动机取向与学习策略
Med Sci Educ. 2024 May 29;34(4):783-793. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02067-z. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Autistic Students' Experiences of Employment and Employability Support while Studying at a UK University.自闭症学生在英国大学学习期间的就业经历及就业支持情况
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):212-222. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本科医学院校学习动机策略及其对学生反馈素养的影响:一项解释性序列混合方法研究。

Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Cordovani Ligia, Jack Susan M, Wong Anne, Monteiro Sandra

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada.

School of Nursing, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 25;35(3):1345-1359. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1
PMID:40625955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12228613/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Feedback from educators to students is considered an important and essential element of effective learning in medical education. Feedback literacy is the process in which a student receives, comprehends, accepts, and makes use of feedback. Factors affecting medical students' feedback literacy include students' characteristics, motivation, abilities in self-assessment, emotional reactions to feedback, and maturity. To generate a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, a sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted to measure students' motivational orientations and explore their strategies towards learning, how these orientations and strategies are related to students' feedback literacy, and how this relationship changes as students progress through a Canadian medical school. In the first quantitative phase, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to first- and last-year medical students at a Canadian university to measure their motivational orientations for learning and learning strategies. Using the quantitative results ( = 58) to develop a sampling strategy for the second phase, individuals with different motivational orientations and learning strategies were identified based on their questionnaires' scores. This purposeful sample ( = 15) was then invited to participate in the second explanatory phase of this study, where a qualitative description approach was applied. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students, divided into two groups: those who through the measurement of 4.62 or below by the MSLQ were identified as having a low motivational orientation for learning ( = 4), and those who through the measurement of 5.34 or above by the MSLQ were identified as having a high motivational orientation for learning ( = 3). Participants' views were explored and synthesized, with the intent for these findings to further explain how medical students' learning motivations and strategies might influence feedback literacy. The integration of findings showed that five factors could be taken into consideration when improving students' feedback literacy skills: learning goal orientation, self-regulation, help seeking, personality traits, and learning experience. Based on those factors, we identified some approaches that could allow the students to enhance their own feedback literacy. Feedback literacy could empower students to have more control over the feedback process and help them to overcome the barriers they still face during the feedback process.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1.

摘要

未标注

教育工作者向学生提供的反馈被视为医学教育中有效学习的重要且关键要素。反馈素养是学生接收、理解、接受并利用反馈的过程。影响医学生反馈素养的因素包括学生的特征、动机、自我评估能力、对反馈的情绪反应以及成熟度。为了更深入地理解这一现象,我们开展了一项序列解释性混合方法研究,以测量学生的动机取向,探索他们的学习策略,这些取向和策略如何与学生的反馈素养相关,以及随着学生在加拿大医学院的学习进程,这种关系如何变化。在第一个定量阶段,我们对加拿大一所大学的一年级和最后一年医学生进行了学习动机策略问卷(MSLQ)测试,以测量他们的学习动机取向和学习策略。利用定量结果(n = 58)制定第二阶段的抽样策略,根据问卷得分确定具有不同动机取向和学习策略的个体。然后邀请这个有目的的样本(n = 15)参与本研究的第二个解释阶段,采用定性描述方法。我们对学生进行了半结构化访谈,分为两组:通过MSLQ测量得分在4. .62及以下的被确定为学习动机取向较低(n = 4),通过MSLQ测量得分在5.34及以上的被确定为学习动机取向较高(n = 3)。探讨并综合了参与者的观点,目的是让这些发现进一步解释医学生的学习动机和策略可能如何影响反馈素养。研究结果的整合表明,在提高学生的反馈素养技能时可以考虑五个因素:学习目标取向、自我调节、寻求帮助、人格特质和学习经历。基于这些因素,我们确定了一些可以让学生提高自身反馈素养的方法。反馈素养可以使学生对反馈过程有更多掌控,并帮助他们克服在反馈过程中仍然面临的障碍。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1获取的补充材料。