Aslan Sultan, Simsek Ulku G, Eroksuz Hatice, Karagulle Burcu, Eroglu Mehmet, Incili Gokhan K, Incili Canan A
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jul;11(4):e70481. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70481.
This study investigated the effects of boric acid added to feed and water on intestinal histopathology, immune parameters, and intestinal bacterial flora in experimentally enteritis-induced Japanese quails. Eighty-four quails were used in the study, which were divided into seven groups. The following groups were used in the study: control (G1), infected (G2), infected + antibiotic (G3), infected + boric acid added to feed (100 mg/kg) (G4), infected + boric acid added to feed (300 mg/kg) (G5), infected + boric acid added into water (100 mg/L) (G6) and infected + boric acid added into water (300 mg/L) (G7). Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, and differences between groups were determined by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The highest levels of white blood cells were found in the infection group, whereas the lowest levels were found in the control group (p < 0.05). Boric acid taken with water decreased the number of Enterobacteriaceae, Escherchia coli, and total mesophilic aerobic bacteria. However, these differences were not significant compared with the infection group (p > 0.05). Compared to the Infected group (G2), the most notable reductions in coliform counts were observed in the boric acid water 300 mg/L group (G7), which decreased from 3.29 to 2.90 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), and in the 100 mg/L group (G6), which showed a decrease to 2.93 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), In contrast, boric acid given in feed (G4 and G5) had no significant effect on any bacterial count compared to the infected group p > 0.05). Consequently, Effective results were observed when boric acid was added to drinking water, even with short-term (7 days) use. Boron derivatives could provide an effective alternative treatment option, especially in combating the growing antibiotic resistance.
本研究调查了在饲料和饮水中添加硼酸对实验性诱发肠炎的日本鹌鹑肠道组织病理学、免疫参数及肠道细菌菌群的影响。本研究使用了84只鹌鹑,将其分为七组。研究中使用了以下几组:对照组(G1)、感染组(G2)、感染+抗生素组(G3)、感染+饲料中添加硼酸(100 mg/kg)组(G4)、感染+饲料中添加硼酸(300 mg/kg)组(G5)、感染+饮水中添加硼酸(100 mg/L)组(G6)和感染+饮水中添加硼酸(300 mg/L)组(G7)。数据采用单因素方差分析进行分析,组间差异通过Tukey氏真实显著性差异检验确定。白细胞水平最高的是感染组,而最低的是对照组(p<0.05)。饮水中添加硼酸可减少肠杆菌科、大肠杆菌和总嗜温需氧菌的数量。然而,与感染组相比,这些差异并不显著(p>0.05)。与感染组(G2)相比,在硼酸300 mg/L饮水组(G7)中观察到大肠菌群数量减少最为显著,从3.29降至2.90 log CFU/g(p<0.01),在100 mg/L组(G6)中降至2.93 log CFU/g(p<0.01)。相比之下,饲料中添加硼酸(G4和G5)与感染组相比,对任何细菌计数均无显著影响(p>0.05)。因此,即使短期(7天)使用,在饮水中添加硼酸也能观察到有效结果。硼衍生物可以提供一种有效的替代治疗选择,尤其是在对抗日益增长的抗生素耐药性方面。