Curry Jordan, Caperchione Cristina M, Greenley Sarah, Dennis Elizabeth, Forbes Cynthia C
Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, UK.
The Activity and Nutrition in Cancer Research Group, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, UK.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 18;33(8):699. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09759-1.
The purpose of this systematic review is to summarise and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of using digital technology to deliver physical activity and/or nutrition interventions to promote wellbeing and independence among adults with advanced or incurable cancer.
Systematic structured searches for any experimental study exploring physical activity and/or nutrition intervention delivery with digital technology were conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All records were screened, extracted, and quality assessed by two authors. Main outcomes were feasibility and acceptability of using technology to help deliver interventions, with secondary outcomes of potential efficacy in any measure of quality of life, wellbeing, or function.
Twenty-nine eligible studies were included. Digital interventions were mostly feasible and acceptable, with high retention rates and participant satisfaction. Many participants expressed willingness to recommend the interventions to others or continue use. Engagement rates were generally high, although fewer studies addressed diet and nutrition than exercise and physical activity interventions.
Digital supportive care interventions may be feasible, well-accepted, and tolerated by individuals with incurable cancer. These platforms could effectively improve this population's support for physical activity and symptom management. However, the heterogeneity in study designs highlights the exploratory nature of these interventions. To advance the field, future research should focus on adequately powered studies, improved generalisability, and standardised tools for measuring outcomes.
This trial has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021295936).
本系统评价旨在总结和评估使用数字技术提供身体活动和/或营养干预措施,以促进晚期或不治之症成年癌症患者的健康和独立性的可行性、可接受性及潜在效果。
在PsycINFO、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、科学引文索引核心合集以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库中,对任何探索使用数字技术进行身体活动和/或营养干预的实验性研究进行系统的结构化检索。两位作者对所有记录进行筛选、提取和质量评估。主要结局是使用技术帮助提供干预措施的可行性和可接受性,次要结局是在任何生活质量、健康或功能指标方面的潜在效果。
纳入了29项符合条件的研究。数字干预大多可行且可接受,保留率和参与者满意度较高。许多参与者表示愿意向他人推荐这些干预措施或继续使用。参与率总体较高,不过与运动和身体活动干预相比,涉及饮食和营养的研究较少。
数字支持性护理干预措施对于不治之症癌症患者可能是可行的、易于接受的且耐受性良好。这些平台可以有效改善该人群对身体活动和症状管理的支持。然而,研究设计的异质性凸显了这些干预措施的探索性质。为推动该领域发展,未来研究应聚焦于有足够样本量的研究、提高普遍性以及用于测量结局的标准化工具。
本试验已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中进行前瞻性注册(注册号:CRD42021295936)。