• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人工智能时代,中国医学生应具备哪些数字能力?

What digital competencies should medical students in China possess in the AI era?

作者信息

Chen Jinjuan, Hou Xiaorong, Lv Yalan, Liu Mimi, Yang Meijie, Zhou Xiaoyu, Du Fei, Yi Jia, Zhang Lingqin, Li Guangying

机构信息

College of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China; Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 402760, China.

College of Artificial Intelligence Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2025 Nov;203:106043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106043. Epub 2025 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106043
PMID:40680320
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the advancement of the digital society and the extensive application of digital medical technologies, the demand for digital competencies among medical students is becoming increasingly critical. Digital competence of medical students refers to the ability of medical students to effectively select and use digital or intelligent technologies and applications to accomplish their studies, research, and future clinical practice. Currently in China, no digital competency framework for medical students has been established based on clinical practice requirements. Therefore, the study aimes to investigate digital competencies for medical students and provide recommendations for future digital competency training initiatives and framework development.

METHODS

Focusing on competency theory, we reviewed and analyzed literature related to digital competency. Twenty experts participated in a two-round Delphi method to iteratively refine and correct the indicator items. Finally, the weights of indicators were calculated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

RESULTS

Twenty experts were invited to participate in two rounds of the Delphi survey, achievinga 100 % response rate in both rounds, with Expert Authority Coefficients of 0.81 and 0.82, indicating the credibility and professional expertise the panelists. Furthermore, Kendall's consistency coefficient (Kendall's W) ranged from 0.143 to 0.275 (p < 0.05), indicating that experts reached a consensus on the indicators. The final framework comprises 3 domains, 9 primary indicators, and 27 secondary indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

A digital competency framework for medical students was developed using the Delphi method. This framework facilitates the self-development of medical students and serves as a reference for the development of digital medical curricula.

摘要

目的

随着数字社会的发展和数字医疗技术的广泛应用,医学生对数字能力的需求日益迫切。医学生的数字能力是指医学生有效选择和使用数字或智能技术及应用来完成学业、研究和未来临床实践的能力。目前在中国,尚未基于临床实践要求建立医学生数字能力框架。因此,本研究旨在调查医学生的数字能力,并为未来的数字能力培训举措和框架制定提供建议。

方法

以能力理论为重点,我们对与数字能力相关的文献进行了回顾和分析。20位专家参与了两轮德尔菲法,以迭代方式完善和修正指标项目。最后,通过层次分析法计算指标权重。

结果

邀请20位专家参与两轮德尔菲调查,两轮的回复率均达到100%,专家权威系数分别为0.81和0.82,表明专家小组的可信度和专业水平。此外,肯德尔一致性系数(Kendall's W)在0.143至0.275之间(p < 0.05),表明专家们在指标上达成了共识。最终框架包括3个领域、9个一级指标和27个二级指标。

结论

采用德尔菲法制定了医学生数字能力框架。该框架有助于医学生的自我发展,并为数字医学课程的开发提供参考。

相似文献

1
What digital competencies should medical students in China possess in the AI era?在人工智能时代,中国医学生应具备哪些数字能力?
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Nov;203:106043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106043. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
2
The Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education Framework: An International Consensus Statement Based on a Delphi Study.医学教育框架中的数字健康能力:基于德尔菲研究的国际共识声明
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131.
3
Study on the construction of a Chinese cardiovascular physician competency model.中国心血管内科医师胜任力模型构建研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09512-y.
4
Construction of an ethical competency evaluation system for clinical physicians in China.构建中国临床医师伦理能力评估体系。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07520-0.
5
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
6
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.利用人工智能重新定义医学教育中的导师指导:关于可行性和影响的德尔菲研究
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Developing an Evaluation Index System for Service Capability of Internet Hospitals in China: Mixed Methods Study.构建中国互联网医院服务能力评估指标体系:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 25;27:e72931. doi: 10.2196/72931.
10
A Delphi-based framework for optimizing nurse staffing in Chinese hospitals.一种基于德尔菲法的优化中国医院护士配置的框架。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 4;13:1510931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510931. eCollection 2025.