Mooij Indra, Apachitei Iulian, Zadpoor Amir A, Fratila-Apachitei Lidy E
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Acta Biomater. 2025 Sep 1;203:21-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.07.036. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
Osteoimmunomodulation (OIM) is emerging as a key biofunctionality of orthopedic implants. Biomaterial surface geometries can modulate the interactions between immune cells and osteoprogenitors at the bone-implant interface, positively affecting osteogenic differentiation and implant osseointegration. This review highlights the recent advancements in geometry-induced OIM (G-OIM) across multiple length scales (nano to mesoscale, including multiscale topographies and 3D scaffolds), identifying relations between specific geometries and subsequent mechanisms of OIM, as provided by the coculture model used. Our review reveals surface geometries with OIM potential at each length scale. These effects can be mediated by both M1 and M2 macrophages, wherein the pathway depends on the shape and length scale of the geometrical cues provided (e.g., integrin-mediated mechanotransduction for nanoscale topographies and macrophage contact inhibition for micropatterns). Most studies assess G-OIM predominantly based on geometry-induced macrophage polarization and its paracrine effect on osteoprogenitors. However, few studies utilizing direct coculture reveal the key role of the direct interplay between macrophages, osteoprogenitors, and biomaterial for OIM. The novel field of G-OIM is advancing at a high pace. It could benefit from improved, clinically relevant coculture models involving human-derived cells and technological developments in biomaterial design and fabrication. Such advances could establish (G-)OIM as a transformative approach for regenerative immunoengineering of orthopedic implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Osteoimmunomodulation, the ability of biomaterials to modulate the interactions between immune cells and skeletal cells to enhance osteogenesis, is increasingly recognized as a crucial biofunctionality for orthopedic biomaterials. Various biomaterial surface geometries can be used to target osteoimmune pathways. Given the complexity of these interactions, suitable coculture models are essential for studying the underlying cellular mechanisms. This review reveals the state-of-the-art results on geometry-induced osteoimmunomodulation. Not only does this review discuss approaches that have been taken thus far in terms of biomaterial geometry design at various length scales, but it also highlights the role of the coculture model in osteoimmunomodulation and the importance of advances in these in vitro models to improve the translation of research to clinical practice.
骨免疫调节(OIM)正逐渐成为骨科植入物的一项关键生物功能。生物材料表面几何形状能够调节骨-植入物界面处免疫细胞与骨祖细胞之间的相互作用,对成骨分化和植入物骨整合产生积极影响。本综述重点介绍了跨多个长度尺度(从纳米到中尺度,包括多尺度形貌和三维支架)的几何形状诱导骨免疫调节(G-OIM)的最新进展,确定了特定几何形状与所使用的共培养模型提供的后续骨免疫调节机制之间的关系。我们的综述揭示了每个长度尺度上具有骨免疫调节潜力的表面几何形状。这些效应可由M1和M2巨噬细胞介导,其中途径取决于所提供几何线索的形状和长度尺度(例如,纳米尺度形貌的整合素介导的机械转导和微图案的巨噬细胞接触抑制)。大多数研究主要基于几何形状诱导的巨噬细胞极化及其对骨祖细胞的旁分泌作用来评估G-OIM。然而,很少有利用直接共培养的研究揭示巨噬细胞、骨祖细胞和生物材料之间直接相互作用对骨免疫调节的关键作用。G-OIM这一新兴领域正在迅速发展。它可以受益于改进的、涉及人源细胞的临床相关共培养模型以及生物材料设计和制造方面的技术发展。这些进展可以将(G-)OIM确立为骨科植入物再生免疫工程的一种变革性方法。重要性声明:骨免疫调节,即生物材料调节免疫细胞与骨骼细胞之间相互作用以增强成骨的能力,越来越被认为是骨科生物材料的一项关键生物功能。各种生物材料表面几何形状可用于靶向骨免疫途径。鉴于这些相互作用的复杂性,合适的共培养模型对于研究潜在的细胞机制至关重要。本综述揭示了几何形状诱导骨免疫调节的最新成果。本综述不仅讨论了迄今为止在不同长度尺度的生物材料几何形状设计方面所采用的方法,还强调了共培养模型在骨免疫调节中的作用以及这些体外模型进展对改善研究向临床实践转化的重要性。