Suppr超能文献

重新审视头颈部癌术后放化疗:RTOG 9501/EORTC 22931的最新长期联合分析

Re-examining post-operative chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer: an updated long-term combined analysis of RTOG 9501/EORTC 22931.

作者信息

Zumsteg Z S, Luu M, Fortpied C, Jang J K, Chen M M, Mallen-St Clair J, Walgama E, Le Q T, Machtay M, Tribius S, Forastiere A, Wong S, Ozsahin E M, Gregoire V, Vermorken J B, Ho A S, Yom S S

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.07.004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-operative chemoradiation (CRT) is generally recommended for head and neck cancer patients with extranodal extension (ENE) and/or positive margins, but not for patients without these features, based on a post hoc analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9501 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22931. However, this analysis lacked tests of interaction necessary to identify a predictive biomarker. In addition, updated data are now available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study assessed 744 patients enrolled on RTOG 9501 and EORTC 22931, randomized trials that compared CRT with radiation (RT) following surgery. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed with Cox regression. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM), other-cause mortality (OCM), and recurrence outcomes were analyzed with competing risks methodology. Tests of interaction assessed for differential benefits of CRT in various subgroups.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6.9 years. Among all patients, CRT improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.97, P = 0.026]. Although CRT improved OS in the subgroup with ENE and/or positive margins (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.003) and not in those without these features (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.30, P = 0.7), tests of interaction showed no evidence of a differential effect of CRT in these subgroups (P-interaction = 0.17). There was also no evidence of interaction when analyzing other outcomes, or when assessing ENE and margin status individually. While CRT significantly reduced CSM (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.83, P < 0.001), it also significantly increased OCM (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.12, P = 0.018). Post-operative CRT improved locoregional recurrence (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85, P = 0.002), but not distant metastasis (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.08, P = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemotherapy improved OS in head and neck cancer patients undergoing post-operative radiotherapy in the combined populations of EORTC 22931 and RTOG 9501. ENE and/or positive margins are not predictive biomarkers, and patients without these features may still benefit from CRT. CRT improved CSM, but this was partly offset by higher OCM. Refining the population most likely to benefit from post-operative CRT, taking into consideration both oncologic and patient-related factors, needs further exploration.

摘要

背景

基于放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)9501和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)22931的事后分析,术后放化疗(CRT)通常推荐用于有淋巴结外侵犯(ENE)和/或切缘阳性的头颈癌患者,但不适用于无这些特征的患者。然而,该分析缺乏识别预测生物标志物所需的交互作用检验。此外,现在已有更新数据。

患者与方法

本研究评估了RTOG 9501和EORTC 22931试验中入组的744例患者,这两项随机试验比较了术后CRT与放疗(RT)。采用Cox回归分析总生存期(OS)。采用竞争风险方法分析癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)、其他原因死亡率(OCM)和复发结局。交互作用检验评估了CRT在不同亚组中的差异获益。

结果

中位随访时间为6.9年。在所有患者中,CRT改善了OS[风险比(HR)0.81,95%置信区间(CI)0.68 - 0.97,P = 0.026]。虽然CRT在有ENE和/或切缘阳性的亚组中改善了OS(HR 0.71,95% CI 0.57 - 0.89,P = 0.003),而在无这些特征的亚组中未改善(HR 0.94,95% CI 0.68 - 1.30,P = 0.7),但交互作用检验未显示CRT在这些亚组中有差异效应的证据(P交互作用 = 0.17)。在分析其他结局时,或单独评估ENE和切缘状态时,也没有交互作用的证据。虽然CRT显著降低了CSM(HR 0.68,95% CI 0.55 - 0.83,P < 0.001),但也显著增加了OCM(HR 1.51,95% CI 1.07 - 2.12,P = 0.018)。术后CRT改善了局部区域复发(HR 0.64,95% CI 0.48 - 0.85,P = 0.002),但未改善远处转移(HR 0.83,95% CI 0.64 - 1.08,P = 0.17)。

结论

在EORTC 22931和RTOG 9501的联合人群中,同步化疗改善了接受术后放疗的头颈癌患者的OS。ENE和/或切缘阳性不是预测生物标志物,无这些特征的患者仍可能从CRT中获益。CRT改善了CSM,但部分被较高的OCM所抵消。考虑肿瘤学和患者相关因素,进一步探索最可能从术后CRT中获益的人群仍需进一步研究。

相似文献

5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy.治疗口腔和口咽癌的干预措施:化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD006386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006386.pub4.

本文引用的文献

9
Predictive classifier for intensive treatment of head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症强化治疗的预测分类器。
Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5263-5273. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33212. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Intensive Therapy.头颈部癌症患者的强化治疗选择。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jan 1;106(1):157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验