Suppr超能文献

自由重量水平和斜板卧推中的负荷-速度关系。

Load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal and incline bench press.

作者信息

Marques Diogo Luís, Abohasel Waleed, Alkahtani Shaea, Alsaeed Mohammed, Algarzae Norah K, Neiva Henrique Pereira, Marinho Daniel Almeida, Marques Mário Cardoso

机构信息

Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, 6200-001, Portugal.

Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Covilhã, 6200-001, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 19;15(1):26203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12166-5.

Abstract

This study compared (i) the load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal (HBP) vs. incline bench press (IBP) and (ii) the differences between general vs. individual load-velocity equations to estimate the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the HBP and IBP. Thirty males (26 ± 3 years) performed four sessions: two dedicated to assessing the 1RM in the HBP and IBP, and another two to measure the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) reached against loads of 40-90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP. Individual load-velocity equations estimated the MPV from 30 to 100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP and the 1RM in each exercise. Furthermore, general equations estimated the 1RM in each exercise. The estimated MPV values associated with 30-100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP were compared. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined the reliability between the actual and estimated 1RM in both exercises. The results showed higher MPV in the HBP than in the IBP from 30 to 80% 1RM (p < 0.001). General and individual equations provided acceptable estimates of the 1RM when using loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP (CV < 10% and ICC > 0.80) but not 40-60% 1RM (CV > 10% and ICC < 0.80). This study shows that the load-velocity relationship differs between HBP and IBP, with higher velocities reached in HBP. Furthermore, individual and general equations seem reliable in estimating the 1RM when using relative loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP.

摘要

本研究比较了

(i)自由重量水平卧推(HBP)与上斜卧推(IBP)中的负荷-速度关系;(ii)通用负荷-速度方程与个体负荷-速度方程在估计HBP和IBP的一次重复最大值(1RM)方面的差异。30名男性(26±3岁)进行了四个阶段的测试:两个阶段专门用于评估HBP和IBP中的1RM,另外两个阶段用于测量在HBP和IBP中对抗40%-90% 1RM负荷时达到的平均推进速度(MPV)。个体负荷-速度方程根据HBP和IBP中30%-100% 1RM的负荷以及每个练习中的1RM来估计MPV。此外,通用方程估计每个练习中的1RM。比较了与HBP和IBP中30%-100% 1RM相关的估计MPV值。变异系数(CV)和组内相关系数(ICC)确定了两种练习中实际1RM与估计1RM之间的可靠性。结果表明,在30%-80% 1RM时,HBP中的MPV高于IBP(p<0.001)。当在HBP和IBP中使用70%-90% 1RM的负荷时,通用方程和个体方程对1RM的估计是可接受的(CV<10%且ICC>0.80),但使用40%-60% 1RM的负荷时则不然(CV>10%且ICC<0.80)。本研究表明,HBP和IBP之间的负荷-速度关系不同,HBP能达到更高的速度。此外,当在HBP和IBP中使用70%-90% 1RM的相对负荷时,个体方程和通用方程在估计1RM方面似乎是可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d76/12274453/c81f94373d9a/41598_2025_12166_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验