Falcão Ila R, Tedde João Guilherme G, Paixao Enny, Cerqueira-Silva Thiago, Rocha Aline Dos Santos, Fiaccone Rosemeire L, Silva Natanael J, de Mello E Silva Juliana Freitas, Ichihara Maria Y, Pescarini Julia M, Ribeiro-Silva Rita de Cássia, Barreto Mauricio Lima
Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil
Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jul 20;10(7):e018431. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018431.
Poverty amplifies the risk of malnutrition, which is particularly harmful to children as it can perpetuate a cycle of poverty and poor health. This study aims to assess the association of a conditional cash transfer programme ( Program (BFP)) with child nutrition nationwide in Brazil.
We used the Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health Birth Cohort (baseline data from the National Registry for Social Programmes (CadÚnico) linked with live births and nutrition registries) to conduct a longitudinal population-based study between 2008 and 2015. This cohort study followed children from birth until 5 years old between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015. Children exposed were those who received the BFP benefit at any time during follow-up and were compared with those who never received it. Malnutrition outcomes were assessed using height-for-age, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age z-scores classified according to WHO cut-offs. Binary and multinomial logistic regressions and kernel-based matching were performed. Subgroup analyses considered maternal education and urban/rural areas of residence.
Our cohort included 3 116 138 children born in Brazil between 2008 and 2015. BFP participation was associated with a 17% lower chance of stunting (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.85). Additionally, BFP was associated with a 19% higher chance of wasting (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.22). The protective association with stunting was more pronounced in children from less-educated mothers (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.81) and those living in rural areas (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.81). BFP participation was associated with higher overweight/obesity among children from mothers with 8 or more years of education and living in urban areas, while those with 3 or fewer years of education and living in rural areas experienced protective effects.
Our findings suggest a complex relationship between BFP participation and child malnutrition outcomes. The study underscores BFP participation's benefits in child nutritional outcomes, emphasising the programme's potential to reduce stunting in all children and to reduce overweight/obesity in the most vulnerable ones. However, BFP was also associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity, which may be a consequence of overlapping stages of Brazil's rapid nutrition transition, a scenario that contributes to the double burden of malnutrition. Further research is needed to understand this finding better.
贫困加剧了营养不良的风险,这对儿童尤其有害,因为它可能使贫困和健康状况不佳的恶性循环持续下去。本研究旨在评估巴西全国范围内有条件现金转移支付计划(BFP计划)与儿童营养之间的关联。
我们利用健康出生队列数据与知识整合中心(来自国家社会计划登记处(CadÚnico)的基线数据与活产和营养登记处相关联),在2008年至2015年期间进行了一项基于人群的纵向研究。这项队列研究追踪了2008年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间从出生到5岁的儿童。暴露组儿童是在随访期间任何时间接受BFP福利的儿童,并与从未接受过该福利的儿童进行比较。使用根据世界卫生组织临界值分类的年龄别身高、身高别体重和年龄别体重指数z评分来评估营养不良结果。进行了二元和多项逻辑回归以及基于核的匹配。亚组分析考虑了母亲的教育程度和城乡居住地区。
我们的队列包括2008年至2015年在巴西出生的3116138名儿童。参与BFP计划与发育迟缓几率降低17%相关(比值比0.83;95%置信区间0.81至0.85)。此外,BFP计划与消瘦几率增加19%相关(比值比1.19;95%置信区间1.16至1.22)。与发育迟缓的保护关联在母亲受教育程度较低的儿童(比值比0.75;95%置信区间0.70至0.81)和居住在农村地区的儿童(比值比0.77;95%置信区间0.73至0.81)中更为明显。参与BFP计划与母亲受教育8年或以上且居住在城市地区的儿童超重/肥胖率较高相关,而母亲受教育3年或以下且居住在农村地区的儿童则有保护作用。
我们的研究结果表明参与BFP计划与儿童营养不良结果之间存在复杂的关系。该研究强调了参与BFP计划对儿童营养结果的益处,强调了该计划在降低所有儿童发育迟缓以及降低最脆弱儿童超重/肥胖方面的潜力。然而,BFP计划也与超重/肥胖风险增加相关,这可能是巴西快速营养转型重叠阶段的结果,这种情况导致了营养不良的双重负担。需要进一步研究以更好地理解这一发现。