Suppr超能文献

Systemic treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis: Inference-based guidance.

作者信息

Papp Kim A, Puig Luis, Beecker Jennifer, Chandran Vinod, Claveau Joël, Cortés Javier, Dutz Jan, Hornick Noah I, Juergens Rosalyn A, Melosky Barbara, Patel Anisha B, Sauder Maxwell B, Sehdev Sandeep, Sibaud Vincent, Snow Stephanie L

机构信息

Probity Medical Research Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Alliance Clinical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20809.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat various cancers. Their use may result in immune-related adverse events, including psoriasis. When managing psoriasis, induced or exacerbated by an ICI, there are concerns regarding immunosuppression from systemic agents for the treatment of psoriasis (saPs) and the potential impact on ICI efficacy. No direct, high-level evidence exists to address these concerns.

OBJECTIVE

To address clinically relevant questions regarding the management of ICI-mediated psoriasis (ICI-Ps) with saPs.

METHODS

We convened a multidisciplinary panel of 15 international specialists in dermatology, oncology, immunology, and rheumatology. A Delphi process defined clinical concerns related to the systemic treatment of ICI-Ps, focusing on the potential of saPs to impact ICI effectiveness. The saPs considered included biologics targeting tumour necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23 and IL-23, traditional systemic therapies (cyclosporine, methotrexate), small molecules targeting phosphodiesterase-4 or tyrosine kinase 2, systemic retinoids (acitretin), and systemic corticosteroids. A systematic review of the literature was supplemented with evidence supporting an inference-based methodology to derive conclusions on the use of systemic therapies in patients with ICI-Ps. The specialist panel rated the strength of the conclusions using a probabilistic scale.

RESULTS

After reviewing the totality of direct and indirect evidence, we drafted inference-based conclusions and ascribed a level of support, focusing on the potential impact of saPs on ICI efficacy. This work provides a structured framework informing healthcare professional and patient discussions on the risks and benefits of using saPs in patients with cancer who experience ICI-Ps.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no direct evidence, we support the following conclusions: saPs may be used to treat ICI-Ps without an appreciable loss of ICI effectiveness. Generally, it is not necessary to interrupt ICI therapy. When available, non-steroid saPs are preferred over systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of psoriasis.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验