Tindall Lucy, Hayward Emily, Li Jinshuo, Kerrigan Philip, Metcalfe Susan, Gega Lina
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Research and Development, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, United Kingdom.
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 4;4:1596294. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2025.1596294. eCollection 2025.
Behavioural activation, a brief psychological therapy for depression across the lifespan lends itself well for delivery in community settings (e.g., non-hospital health services, schools, charities). Ahead of a randomised controlled trial, we wanted to "road-test" our recruitment and assessment processes, intervention materials and data collection tools, and understand (1): how BA can be delivered in community settings and by whom, (2) whether young people will adopt and complete it, (3) whether there are any observed changes in depression and anxiety and (4) whether usual care would be a feasible comparator.
In three settings-one community-based child and adolescent mental health service, one school, one charity-we offered up to 8 sessions of behavioural activation to 12-18-year-olds with mild-to-moderate depression. Stakeholder consultations helped us develop our research materials and processes. Self-report questionnaires assessing depression, anxiety, quality-of-life and resource use were completed by participants at baseline and 8-weeks. Professionals completed an online questionnaire about usual care for young people with depression in different settings, including types of support and staff delivering it.
Twenty young people (average age 15 years, 17 females) consented; of those, 19 attended behavioural activation sessions ( = 7.4, : 1.5) and all 20 completed baseline and follow-up measures. For three-quarters of participants there was a "positive" change in scores (defined as a drop of ≥1 on the RCADS) from baseline to follow-up across all measures. A Resource Use Questionnaire for Adolescents collecting information about use of hospital and community-based health and social care services was developed and tested during the study. Intervention costs were modest at £207 (: £79) per participant for just over 5 h ( = 286 min, = 63 min) of contact on average with a professional.
Excellent intervention uptake and adherence (implying robust recruitment and assessment processes), retention to follow-up and data completeness, and a positive direction of change across all outcome measures justify the need for a fully powered randomised controlled trial comparing community-based behavioural activation with usual care for adolescents with mild-to-moderate depression. Furthermore, usual care rarely included behavioural activation, which made it a suitable comparator for a future randomised controlled trial.
https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN30483950, identifier (ISRCTN, ISRCTN304839502).
行为激活疗法是一种针对全年龄段抑郁症的简短心理治疗方法,非常适合在社区环境(如非医院健康服务机构、学校、慈善机构)中实施。在一项随机对照试验之前,我们希望对招募和评估流程、干预材料以及数据收集工具进行“实地测试”,并了解:(1)行为激活疗法在社区环境中如何实施以及由谁来实施;(2)年轻人是否会接受并完成该疗法;(3)抑郁和焦虑症状是否有明显改善;(4)常规护理是否是一个可行的对照方法。
在三个场所——一个社区儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构、一所学校、一个慈善机构——我们为12至18岁患有轻度至中度抑郁症的青少年提供了最多8次行为激活治疗课程。通过与利益相关者协商,我们制定了研究材料和流程。参与者在基线和8周时完成了自我报告问卷,以评估抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和资源使用情况。专业人员完成了一份在线问卷,内容涉及不同环境下为患有抑郁症的年轻人提供常规护理的情况,包括支持类型和提供护理的工作人员。
20名年轻人(平均年龄15岁,17名女性)同意参与;其中,19人参加了行为激活治疗课程(平均课程数=7.4,标准差=1.5),所有20人都完成了基线和随访测量。四分之三的参与者在所有测量指标上从基线到随访的分数都有“正向”变化(定义为在RCADS上下降≥1分)。在研究期间,我们开发并测试了一份青少年资源使用问卷,用于收集有关医院和社区健康及社会护理服务使用情况的信息。干预成本适中,每位参与者约207英镑(标准差=79英镑),平均与专业人员接触时间略超过5小时(平均=286分钟,标准差=63分钟)。
良好的干预接受度和依从性(意味着强大的招募和评估流程)、随访保留率和数据完整性,以及所有结果指标的正向变化趋势,证明有必要进行一项充分有力的随机对照试验,比较社区行为激活疗法与针对轻度至中度抑郁症青少年的常规护理。此外,常规护理很少包括行为激活疗法,这使其成为未来随机对照试验的合适对照方法。
https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN30483950,标识符(ISRCTN,ISRCTN304839502)。