Suppr超能文献

自发性海绵体活动评估在鉴别心理性勃起功能障碍中被误诊的海绵体静脉闭塞功能障碍方面的临床价值。

Clinical value of spontaneous cavernous activity evaluation in identifying misdiagnosed corporal venous occlusive dysfunction in psychogenic erectile dysfunction.

作者信息

Meng Zizhou, Bai Haowei, Liu Shiyun, Zhi Erlei, Tian Ruhui, Yao Chencheng, Li Peng, Huang Yuhua, Chen Huixing, Zhao Fujun, Han Bangmin, Xia Shujie, Li Zheng, Chen Huirong

机构信息

Clinical Medical Center of Urology, Institute of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1691-1700. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-174. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that corporal venous occlusive dysfunction (CVOD) may be misdiagnosed in some patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED), as the observed venous leakage could actually reflect cavernous smooth muscle (CSM) relaxation failure due to sympathetic overactivity. Misdiagnosed CVOD can lead to inappropriate treatment decisions, such as unnecessary penile venous surgery or reliance solely on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), overlooking the need for psychogenic interventions. Therefore, it is important to identify the misdiagnosis of CVOD. Corpus cavernosum electromyography (CC-EMG) offers unique insights into the autonomic and myogenic integrity of CSM. This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical value of spontaneous cavernous activity (SCA) assessment in identifying misdiagnosed CVOD in psychogenic ED.

METHODS

The study enrolled 168 ED patients who underwent comprehensive evaluation using color duplex Doppler ultrasound (CDDU) and CC-EMG-based SCA assessment (amplitude and duration). Psychogenic ED was confirmed through nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) monitoring. CVOD patients identified by CDDU were stratified into two subgroups based on NPTR results: psychogenic ED group (misdiagnosed CVOD) and organic ED group (actual CVOD).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 69 cases (41.1%) of non-vascular ED (NVED), 67 cases (39.9%) of CVOD, 15 cases (8.9%) of arterial ED (AED), and 17 cases (10.1%) of mixed ED (MED). Among CVOD patients, 30 cases were classified as misdiagnosed CVOD and 37 as actual CVOD. Comparative analysis demonstrated that the SCA parameters were significantly higher in the misdiagnosed CVOD group compared to those of the actual CVOD group, with notable differences in amplitude (305.65±196.79 172.07±86.36 µV, P=0.002) and duration (3.31±1.94 2.36±1.26 s, P=0.046). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.666 [P=0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.503-0.830] for SCA amplitude, with an optimal cutoff of 357.50 µV yielding 94.7% specificity and 55.0% sensitivity, indicating its potential predictive value for identifying misdiagnosed CVOD in psychogenic ED.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested that elevated SCA may contribute to CVOD development in psychogenic ED through impaired CSM relaxation due to sympathetic overactivity. SCA assessment might be a useful diagnostic tool for identifying misdiagnosed CVOD in psychogenic ED. However, given the modest AUC, along with high specificity but low sensitivity of SCA parameters for diagnosing misdiagnosed CVOD, further research is needed to identify additional clinical parameters with better predictive performance.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,在一些患有心因性勃起功能障碍(ED)的患者中,海绵体静脉闭塞功能障碍(CVOD)可能会被误诊,因为观察到的静脉漏实际上可能反映了由于交感神经过度活跃导致的海绵体平滑肌(CSM)松弛功能障碍。CVOD误诊可能导致不恰当的治疗决策,如不必要的阴茎静脉手术或仅依赖5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(PDE5i),而忽视了心理干预的必要性。因此,识别CVOD的误诊很重要。海绵体肌电图(CC-EMG)为CSM的自主神经和肌源性完整性提供了独特的见解。本回顾性分析旨在评估自发海绵体活动(SCA)评估在识别心因性ED中误诊的CVOD方面的临床价值。

方法

本研究纳入了168例ED患者,这些患者接受了彩色双功能多普勒超声(CDDU)和基于CC-EMG的SCA评估(幅度和持续时间)的综合评估。通过夜间阴茎勃起和硬度(NPTR)监测确诊为心因性ED。根据CDDU识别出的CVOD患者根据NPTR结果分为两个亚组:心因性ED组(误诊的CVOD)和器质性ED组(实际的CVOD)。

结果

该队列包括69例(41.1%)非血管性ED(NVED)、67例(39.9%)CVOD、15例(8.9%)动脉性ED(AED)和17例(10.1%)混合性ED(MED)。在CVOD患者中,30例被分类为误诊的CVOD,37例为实际的CVOD。对比分析表明,误诊的CVOD组的SCA参数显著高于实际的CVOD组,在幅度(305.65±196.79对172.07±86.36 μV,P=0.002)和持续时间((3.31±1.94对2.36±1.26 s,P=0.046)方面存在显著差异。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,SCA幅度的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.666 [P=0.02,95%置信区间(CI):0.503-0.830],最佳截断值为357.50 μV,特异性为94.7%,敏感性为55.0%,表明其在识别心因性ED中误诊的CVOD方面具有潜在的预测价值。

结论

研究结果表明,SCA升高可能通过交感神经过度活跃导致CSM松弛受损,从而促成心因性ED中CVOD的发生。SCA评估可能是识别心因性ED中误诊的CVOD的有用诊断工具。然而,鉴于AUC中等,以及SCA参数诊断误诊的CVOD时特异性高但敏感性低,需要进一步研究以确定具有更好预测性能的其他临床参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ef1/12271953/9165c0717d78/tau-14-06-1691-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验