• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体供体右半肝切除术后年龄对老年供体肝脏再生的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

作者信息

Kim Na Reum, Choi Gi Hong, Choi Jin Sub, Han Dai Hoon

机构信息

Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jul;109(1):27-34. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27
PMID:40688263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12270925/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Given the widening of the donor pool to include patients with steatosis, small-for-size grafts, and older patients, this study examined the effect of age on liver volumetric regeneration after a donor right hepatectomy.

METHODS

We enrolled 33 older (≥55 years) and 277 younger (<30 years) donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between March 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score-matched analysis, the perioperative surgical outcomes and growth rates of the remnant liver in 63 younger and 32 older donors were compared. Liver regeneration was assessed using CT volumetry for up to 6 months after surgery. Poor liver regeneration was defined as restoration of less than 80% of the original liver volume. The risk factors for poor liver regeneration were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The mean age of older and younger donors was 58.0 and 24.3 years, respectively. Despite comparable preoperative factors, older donors showed significantly lower regeneration rates at all observed time points (1 month: 75.5% 82.3%, P = 0.001; 3 months: 80.4% 90.5%, P < 0.001; and 6 months: 87.9% 95.8, P = 0.006, compared to total liver volume). A large total liver volume and older age were identified as risk factors for poor liver regeneration.

CONCLUSION

Older donors showed a reduced capacity for liver regeneration. This finding suggests the need for the development of more conservative criteria for residual liver volume in older donors than for younger donors to ensure donor safety.

摘要

目的

鉴于供体库的扩大,纳入了脂肪变性患者、小体积供肝患者和老年患者,本研究探讨了年龄对供体右半肝切除术后肝脏体积再生的影响。

方法

我们纳入了2012年3月至2022年12月期间接受供体右半肝切除术的33例老年(≥55岁)供体和277例年轻(<30岁)供体。经过倾向评分匹配分析后,比较了63例年轻供体和32例老年供体的围手术期手术结局和残余肝脏的生长率。术后长达6个月使用CT容积测量法评估肝脏再生情况。肝脏再生不良定义为肝脏体积恢复不到原始肝脏体积的80%。使用二元逻辑回归模型分析肝脏再生不良的危险因素。

结果

老年供体和年轻供体的平均年龄分别为58.0岁和24.3岁。尽管术前因素相当,但老年供体在所有观察时间点的再生率均显著较低(与全肝体积相比,1个月时:75.5%对82.3%,P = 0.001;3个月时:80.4%对90.5%,P < 0.001;6个月时:87.9%对95.8%,P = 0.006)。全肝体积大以及年龄大被确定为肝脏再生不良的危险因素。

结论

老年供体的肝脏再生能力降低。这一发现表明,需要制定比年轻供体更保守的老年供体残余肝体积标准,以确保供体安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b547/12270925/eb6f3e147de1/astr-109-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b547/12270925/bd41d1361e13/astr-109-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b547/12270925/eb6f3e147de1/astr-109-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b547/12270925/bd41d1361e13/astr-109-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b547/12270925/eb6f3e147de1/astr-109-27-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.活体供体右半肝切除术后年龄对老年供体肝脏再生的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jul;109(1):27-34. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Liver fibrosis is a major risk factor for liver regeneration: A comparison between healthy and fibrotic liver.肝纤维化是肝脏再生的主要危险因素:健康肝脏与纤维化肝脏的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020003.
3
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Outcomes of donation after brain death heart transplantation from older donors: A contemporary analysis of the UNOS database.老年供体脑死亡后心脏移植的结果:对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库的当代分析
JHLT Open. 2025 Jun 4;9:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100313. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.性别作为肾移植后同种异体移植及患者相关预后的预测因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
7
[Efficacy and prognostic factors of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors].[小儿供体劈离式肝移植的疗效及预后因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 24;105(24):1997-2004. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250206-00255.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.用于宫颈成熟和引产的一氧化氮供体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;12(12):CD006901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006901.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curve for robotic versus laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy: A retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜活体供肝肝切除术的手术结果及学习曲线比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Dec;108:107000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.107000. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
2
Outcomes of Robotic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy From 52 Consecutive Cases: Comparison With Open and Laparoscopy-assisted Donor Hepatectomy.52 例连续机器人辅助活体右半肝切除术的结果:与开放性和腹腔镜辅助供肝切除术的比较。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e433-e442. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004067.
3
Impact of Donor Age on the Outcome of Living-donor Liver Transplantation: Special Consideration to the Feasibility of Using Elderly Donors.
供者年龄对活体肝移植结局的影响:特别考虑使用老年供者的可行性。
Transplantation. 2021 Feb 1;105(2):328-337. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003246.
4
Comparison of liver regeneration in laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation.腹腔镜与开放右半肝切除术用于成人活体肝移植时肝脏再生情况的比较
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020 Feb;24(1):33-37. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.1.33. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Volumetric and Functional Regeneration of Remnant Liver after Hepatectomy.肝切除术后残肝的体积和功能再生。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 May;23(5):914-921. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3985-5. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
The Relationship Between Postoperative Chemotherapy and Remnant Liver Regeneration and Outcomes After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.结直肠癌肝转移术后化疗与残肝再生及预后的关系
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1973-1983. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3952-1. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation.使用边缘供肝进行活体肝移植的可行性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 21;24(23):2441-2456. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i23.2441.
8
Right lobe living donors ages 55 years old and older in liver transplantation.肝移植中 55 岁及以上右叶活体供者。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Oct;23(10):1305-1311. doi: 10.1002/lt.24823.
9
Mechanism of impairment on liver regeneration in elderly patients: Role of hepatic stellate cell function.老年患者肝再生受损机制:肝星状细胞功能的作用。
Hepatol Res. 2017 May;47(6):505-513. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12872. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Longterm clinical and radiological follow-up of living liver donors.活体肝供体的长期临床和影像学随访
Liver Transpl. 2016 Jul;22(7):934-42. doi: 10.1002/lt.24442.