• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定期校准后使用代谢模拟器进行每日验证可提高心肺运动测试的质量。

Daily validation using a metabolic simulator after regular calibration increases the quality of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

作者信息

Xu Fan, Sun Xing-Guo, Liu Fang, Zhai Wen-Xuan, Song Ya, Tai Wen-Qi, Wang Ji-Nan, Zhang Yan-Fang, Zhou Qing-Qing, Shi Chao, Xie Ben, Chen Jia-Hao, Huang Jiang, Zhang Zeng-Fei, Xiang Meng-Jun, Ye Shao-Dong, Li Lin

机构信息

Department of Functional Testing Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Research Center of Clinical Medicine for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):3863-3872. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-525. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-525
PMID:40688332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12268752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gas exchange measurements, such as oxygen uptake ( ) and carbon dioxide output ( ), of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), are the key and gold standard for human cardiopulmonary functional evaluation. However, in terms of quality control, they are unstable and inaccurate. We used a metabolic simulator (MS) to detect measurement errors and enhance quality control.

METHODS

In the Fuwai CPET laboratory, we performed CPET after systems had: (I) passed all the steps of regular system calibrations for flow and the partial pressure of O and CO; and (II) passed the MS validation of and at low, medium, and high metabolic rates (MRs) daily from 2014 to 2023 for eight different CPET carts/systems. The absolute percentage difference of the 1 validation of both and was calculated as follows: |[(measured - ideal) / ideal] × 100%|. A difference of <10% was set as the 1 validation pass standard to run the laboratory, while a difference of ≥10% was classified as a 1 validation failure. The absolute percentage difference of the 1 validation among the eight carts/systems was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The rate of the 1 validation failure, the number of validation days, and the median absolute percentage difference of the 1 validation among the different CPET carts/systems were clustered using the hierarchical clustering method.

RESULTS

In total, we completed 1,810 validation days for the eight CPET carts/systems, and found a 10,860 absolute percentage difference of the 1 validation of and . The number of validation days completed by each cart/system and the 1 validation failure rates were as follows: 8 (87.50%), 10 (90.00%), 54 (48.15%), 349 (43.27%), 20 (45.00%), 759 (21.21%), 525 (29.52%), and 85 (22.35%), respectively. The overall absolute percentage difference of the 1 validation of each cart/system was 7.32% (P, P: 3.67%, 13.82%), 9.12% (P, P: 3.33%, 30.4%), 6.82% (P, P: 4.31%, 9.06%), 5.40% (P, P: 2.60%, 8.26%), 4.90% (P, P: 2.21%, 9.68%), 4.32% (P, P: 2.17%, 6.78%), 5.62% (P, P: 2.96%, 8.19%), and 5.35% (P, P: 2.55%, 7.81%), respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis H test results revealed significant differences among the eight carts/systems (H=274.86, P<0.001), and the pairwise comparisons showed that cart/system F had the lowest absolute percentage difference of 4.32% (P, P: 2.17%, 6.78%). The hierarchical cluster classified carts/systems A and B as one cluster, carts/systems C, E, and H as another cluster, and carts/systems D, F, and G as yet another cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an MS can decrease measurement errors and variability for CPET. It can also improve the quality control of CPET.

摘要

背景

心肺运动试验(CPET)中的气体交换测量,如摄氧量( )和二氧化碳排出量( ),是人体心肺功能评估的关键和金标准。然而,在质量控制方面,它们不稳定且不准确。我们使用代谢模拟器(MS)来检测测量误差并加强质量控制。

方法

在阜外CPET实验室,我们在系统完成以下操作后进行CPET:(I)通过流量以及氧气和二氧化碳分压的常规系统校准的所有步骤;(II)在2014年至2023年期间,每天对八个不同的CPET推车/系统在低、中、高代谢率(MR)下进行 和 的MS验证。 和 的第一次验证的绝对百分比差异计算如下:|[(测量值 - 理想值) / 理想值]×100%|。将差异<10%设定为实验室运行的第一次验证通过标准,而差异≥10%则归类为第一次验证失败。使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较八个推车/系统之间第一次验证的绝对百分比差异。使用层次聚类方法对不同CPET推车/系统之间的第一次验证失败率、验证天数以及第一次验证的中位绝对百分比差异进行聚类。

结果

我们总共为八个CPET推车/系统完成了1810天的验证,发现 和 的第一次验证的绝对百分比差异为10860。每个推车/系统完成的验证天数和第一次验证失败率如下:分别为8天(87.50%)、10天(90.00%)、54天(48.15%)、349天(43.27%)、20天(45.00%)、759天(21.21%)、525天(29.52%)和85天(22.35%)。每个推车/系统第一次验证的总体绝对百分比差异分别为7.32%( , :3.67%,13.82%)、9.12%( , :3.33%,30.4%)、6.82%( , :4.31%,9.06%)、5.40%( , :2.60%,8.26%)、4.90%( , :2.21%,9.68%)、4.32%( , ):2.17%,6.78%)、5.62%( , :2.96%,8.19%)和5.35%( , :2.55%,7.81%)。Kruskal-Wallis H检验结果显示八个推车/系统之间存在显著差异(H = 274.86,P < 0.001),两两比较表明推车/系统F的绝对百分比差异最低,为4.32%( , :2.17%,6.78%)。层次聚类将推车/系统A和B归为一个聚类,推车/系统C、E和H归为另一个聚类,推车/系统D、F和G归为另一个聚类。

结论

使用MS可以减少CPET的测量误差和变异性。它还可以改善CPET的质量控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/b8c34aca7ecb/jtd-17-06-3863-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/7639d9775dec/jtd-17-06-3863-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/807222e6abd6/jtd-17-06-3863-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/b8c34aca7ecb/jtd-17-06-3863-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/7639d9775dec/jtd-17-06-3863-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/807222e6abd6/jtd-17-06-3863-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c1/12268752/b8c34aca7ecb/jtd-17-06-3863-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Daily validation using a metabolic simulator after regular calibration increases the quality of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.定期校准后使用代谢模拟器进行每日验证可提高心肺运动测试的质量。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):3863-3872. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-525. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Holistic integrative interpretation for similarities and differences of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) pathophysiological characteristics in patients with left and right heart failure.左、右心衰竭患者心肺运动试验(CPET)病理生理特征异同的整体综合解读
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):4015-4033. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-519. Epub 2025 May 26.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
6
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
7
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
8
Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome.慢性疲劳综合征的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 20;12(12):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub6.
9
Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome.慢性疲劳综合征的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub7.
10
Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome.慢性疲劳综合征的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 24(6):CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub5.

本文引用的文献

1
[Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for exercise prescription in cardiac rehabilitation].[心脏康复中用于运动处方的心肺运动试验]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(1):26-32. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00921-4. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Validity of four commercially available metabolic carts for assessing resting metabolic rate and respiratory exchange ratio in non-ventilated humans.四种市售代谢车评估非机械通气患者静息代谢率和呼吸交换率的有效性。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;41(3):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.031. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
3
Practical guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults.
成人心肺运动试验实用指南。
Respir Res. 2022 Jan 12;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01895-6.
4
Comparison of Two Metabolic Simulators Used for Gas Exchange Verification in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Carts.用于心肺运动试验推车中气体交换验证的两种代谢模拟器的比较。
Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 3;12:667386. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.667386. eCollection 2021.
5
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Basics of Methodology and Measurements.心肺运动试验:方法学和测量基础。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jul;14(Supplement_1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-997FR.
6
Biological quality control for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multicenter clinical trials.多中心临床试验中心肺运动试验的生物学质量控制
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Jan 16;16:13. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0174-8.
7
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical evaluation of patients with heart and lung disease.心肺运动试验在心肺疾病患者的临床评估中的应用
Circulation. 2011 Feb 15;123(6):668-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914788.
8
Clinician's Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.成人心肺运动试验临床医生指南:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):191-225. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e52e69. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
9
Oscillatory breathing and exercise gas exchange abnormalities prognosticate early mortality and morbidity in heart failure.振荡性呼吸和运动气体交换异常预示心力衰竭患者的早期死亡率和发病率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.075.
10
Quality assurance and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical trials.临床试验中的质量保证与心肺运动试验
J Card Fail. 2008 May;14(4):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.01.001.