Do Kenny H, Kawana Eric, Young Kurtis, Tian Sisi, Kim Jee-Hong, Bigcas Jo-Lawrence
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86270. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Epistaxis is a common condition that is often benign and does not require serious intervention. The use of microwave ablation (MWA) is a relatively new technique for treating epistaxis. This systematic review examines the efficacy and safety of using MWA to treat common nosebleeds. It was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two databases, PubMed and EMBASE, were used to identify and aggregate articles for this systematic review. The search terms yielded a total of 2,691 articles with years ranging from 1947 to 2023. After screening, one case series, one randomized control trial, and five observational studies fit the inclusion criteria. Minimal complications were experienced by patients who underwent MWA treatment. A total of 876 patients underwent MWA, with 852 reporting no recurrence at 3 or 6 months, indicating a 97.3% success rate. Three of the seven studies were pooled in a meta-analysis, revealing a pooled log odds ratio of 2.05 (95% CI: 1.19-2.91; p = 0.00), indicating higher odds of recurrent bleeding with observation or silver nitrate versus MWA. In a study of 83 patients, the average pain score was 1.83 during the MWA procedure and decreased to 0.95 one hour afterward. Overall, MWA is a safe and effective treatment for epistaxis, with low rebleeding and complication rates. Further research and a meta-analysis comparing MWA with traditional treatments are recommended to enhance our understanding.
鼻出血是一种常见病症,通常为良性,无需进行严重干预。微波消融(MWA)的应用是一种相对较新的治疗鼻出血的技术。本系统评价考察了使用MWA治疗常见鼻出血的疗效和安全性。该评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行。使用PubMed和EMBASE这两个数据库来识别和汇总用于本系统评价的文章。检索词共得到2691篇文章,年份跨度从1947年至2023年。经过筛选,1个病例系列、1项随机对照试验和5项观察性研究符合纳入标准。接受MWA治疗的患者出现的并发症极少。共有876例患者接受了MWA治疗,其中852例在3个月或6个月时报告无复发,成功率为97.3%。7项研究中的3项被纳入Meta分析,结果显示合并对数比值比为2.05(95%CI:1.19 - 2.91;p = 0.00),表明与MWA相比,观察或硝酸银治疗后复发出血的几率更高。在一项针对83例患者的研究中,MWA操作过程中的平均疼痛评分为1.83,1小时后降至0.95。总体而言,MWA是一种治疗鼻出血安全有效的方法,再出血率和并发症发生率较低。建议进一步开展研究并进行Meta分析,将MWA与传统治疗方法进行比较,以增进我们的了解。