Theofanopoulos Andreas, Khajuria Rajiv Kumar, Khan Dilaware, Troude Lucas, Waldau Ben, Faust Katharina, Muhammad Sajjad
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 2;5:104309. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104309. eCollection 2025.
Giant saccular posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges, mainly due to the challenging approach required for aneurysm obliteration.
To review treatment modalities and outcomes of patients harboring giant (>2.5 cm) PCA saccular aneurysms distal to the basilar bifurcation.
A systematic literature review through PubMed and Scopus to identify cases of giant saccular PCA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or endovascularly. Patients' demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes and follow-up information were retrieved.
Data from 33 studies including 55 patients were obtained. Mean patient age was 34.35 years. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 38.48 mm. Presentation was aneurysm rupture in 30.9 %, headache in 23.6 %, hemiparesis or tetraparesis in 12.7 %, hemianopsia in 10.9 % and hydrocephalus in 5.5 %. At least 30.9 % had significant brainstem compression. Treatment was endovascular in 23.6 %, microsurgical in 67.3 % and combined in 9.1 %. Debulking to reduce mass effect was required in 32.4 %. Preoperative mRS ranged from 1 to 5. A favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was reported on 92.7 % of cases. Death rate was 3.6 %. The PCA was sacrificed in 40 % of the patients without severe neurologic morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 11 years.
Giant PCA aneurysms are amenable to both treatment modalities. PCA sacrifice may be required and is often well tolerated, presumably due to the rich collateral supply. Mass effect may necessitate debulking. PCA bypass may be required, but carries significant morbidity.
巨大囊状大脑后动脉(PCA)动脉瘤是罕见病变,因占位效应导致显著的发病率,并且带来治疗挑战,主要是因为动脉瘤闭塞所需的手术入路具有挑战性。
回顾基底动脉分叉远端巨大(>2.5 cm)PCA囊状动脉瘤患者的治疗方式及结果。
通过PubMed和Scopus进行系统文献综述,以确定接受显微手术或血管内治疗的巨大囊状PCA动脉瘤病例。检索患者的人口统计学资料、动脉瘤大小、术前和术后神经状态、临床结果及随访信息。
获得了来自33项研究的55例患者的数据。患者平均年龄为34.35岁。动脉瘤平均最大直径为38.48 mm。临床表现为动脉瘤破裂占30.9%,头痛占23.6%,偏瘫或四肢瘫占12.7%,偏盲占10.9%,脑积水占5.5%。至少30.9%有明显的脑干受压。23.6%采用血管内治疗,67.3%采用显微手术治疗,9.1%采用联合治疗。32.4%需要进行减瘤以减轻占位效应。术前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分范围为1至5分。92.7%的病例报告有良好结局(mRS 0 - 2)。死亡率为3.6%。40%的患者大脑后动脉被牺牲且无严重神经功能障碍。随访时间从1周到11年不等。
巨大大脑后动脉动脉瘤两种治疗方式均适用。可能需要牺牲大脑后动脉,且通常耐受性良好,推测是由于丰富的侧支供应。占位效应可能需要减瘤。可能需要大脑后动脉搭桥,但有显著的发病率。