Suppr超能文献

暗适应测量动力学可区分年龄相关性黄斑变性与中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变。

Dark Adaptometry Kinetics Differentiates Age-Related Macular Degeneration from Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.

作者信息

Verghese Ashwin P, Lasalle Claudia C, Ramsey David J

机构信息

Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, UMass Chan - Lahey School of Medicine, Burlington, Massachusetts.

Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 May 26;5(6):100835. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100835. eCollection 2025 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic utility of dark adaptometry (DA) rod intercept time (RIT) to differentiate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of AMD or CSCR who were ≥50 years of age.

METHODS

The study included patients who had completed a DA study in ≥1 eye measured at 5° superior to the fovea on the retina. All patients underwent a comprehensive retina examination, including OCT assessment of the macula.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were classified based on their RIT, with an RIT >6.50 minutes considered a delay.

RESULTS

The study included 67 patients with AMD and 25 with CSCR. Patients with AMD tended to be older (73.8 ± 8.9 years vs. 65.0 ± 7.2 years, < 0.001) and were more likely female (53.7% vs. 28.0%, = 0.049) compared with their CSCR counterparts. Additionally, patients with AMD tended to exhibit poorer vision in both their better-seeing (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.14 ± 0.13 vs. 0.08 ± 0.13, = 0.057) and worse-seeing (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.48 ± 0.47 vs. 0.26 ± 0.25, = 0.028) eyes. Rod intercept times were slower in patients with AMD compared with CSCR, both in the faster-adapting (12.44 ± 6.96 minutes vs. 4.01 ± 1.28 minutes, < 0.001) and slower-adapting (13.06 ± 6.67 minutes vs. 4.95 ± 1.78 minutes, < 0.001) eyes. Using a delayed RIT in the faster-adapting eye to classify patients with AMD versus CSCR showed excellent performance with a sensitivity of 79.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.4%-88.1%) and perfect specificity of 100.0% (95% CI: 86.3%-100.0%), yielding an accuracy of 97.4% (95% CI: 91.7%-99.6%). After adjusting for age, sex, and visual acuity, RIT in the faster-adapting eye remained an independent predictor of AMD versus CSCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged dark adaptation, indicated by a longer RIT, is capable of distinguishing individuals with AMD from CSCR, 2 conditions that share similar fundus features. Future investigations are warranted to assess the effectiveness of this noninvasive technique for AMD screening.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

摘要

目的

评估暗适应测量法(DA)的视杆细胞截获时间(RIT)在鉴别年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)与中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)方面的诊断效用。

设计

回顾性连续病例系列研究。

参与者

年龄≥50岁、临床诊断为AMD或CSCR的连续患者。

方法

该研究纳入了在视网膜中央凹上方5°处至少一只眼完成DA研究的患者。所有患者均接受了全面的视网膜检查,包括黄斑的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估。

主要观察指标

根据患者的RIT进行分类,RIT>6.50分钟被视为延迟。

结果

该研究纳入了67例AMD患者和25例CSCR患者。与CSCR患者相比,AMD患者年龄更大(73.8±8.9岁 vs. 65.0±7.2岁,P<0.001),女性比例更高(53.7% vs. 28.0%,P = 0.049)。此外,AMD患者在视力较好眼(最小分辨角对数0.14±0.13 vs. 0.08±0.13,P = 0.057)和视力较差眼(最小分辨角对数0.48±0.47 vs. 0.26±0.25,P = 0.028)的视力往往更差。与CSCR患者相比,AMD患者的视杆细胞截获时间在快速适应眼(12.44±6.96分钟 vs. 4.01±1.28分钟,P<0.001)和慢速适应眼(13.06±6.67分钟 vs. 4.95±1.78分钟,P<0.001)均较慢。使用快速适应眼的延迟RIT对AMD患者与CSCR患者进行分类,表现出色,敏感性为79.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:67.4%-88.1%),特异性为100.0%(95%CI:86.3%-100.0%),准确率为97.4%(95%CI:91.7%-99.6%)。在调整年龄、性别和视力后,快速适应眼的RIT仍然是AMD与CSCR的独立预测指标。

结论

较长的RIT表明暗适应延长,这能够区分患有AMD和CSCR的个体,这两种疾病具有相似的眼底特征。有必要进行进一步研究以评估这种非侵入性技术用于AMD筛查的有效性。

财务披露

在本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会找到专有或商业披露信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c13/12271418/7e1ddf74fbf0/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验