Conejeros-Pavez Jose, Vasquez Javiera, Diaz Camila, Mena Cristian, Undurraga Juan, Gonzalez-Valderrama Alfonso, Claro Susana, Undurraga Eduardo A, Crossley Nicolas A
School of Government, https://ror.org/04teye511Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, https://ror.org/04teye511Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 21;55:e205. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101062.
The premorbid phase of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) may reveal underlying mechanisms and inform early interventions. According to the neurodevelopmental hypothesis, treatment resistance may be linked to pronounced developmental impairments. We examined school grades and attendance trajectories in children who later developed TRS.
This case-control study analyzed school grade point average and attendance among all individuals born after 1990 and started on clozapine in Chile's public health system as a proxy for TRS. Control groups included children later diagnosed with treatment-responsive schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unaffected classmates. Linear mixed models accounted for individual and school-level confounders.
We included 1072 children (9929 observations, 29.3% female) subsequently diagnosed with TRS, 323 (2802 observations, 25.7% female) with schizophrenia, 175 (1784 observations, 53.8% female) bipolar disorder, and 273,260 (533,335 observations, 47% female) unaffected classmates. Children who later developed TRS had worse grades across levels than their classmates (-0.26 SD [-0.2, -0.4]), but not treatment-responsive schizophrenia. All severe mental illness groups showed grade declines in later school levels, with TRS showing steeper linear decline than treatment-responsive schizophrenia (× of -0.03; 95%CI -0.04, -0.01) and steeper quadratic decline than bipolar disorder ( of -0.005; -0.01, -0.001). Attendance declined over time in the two groups developing schizophrenia compared to their classmates. Those developing TRS experienced the sharpest drop ( compared to schizophrenia -0.03; -0.05, -0.01 and bipolar disorder -0.027; -0.049, -0.006).
TRS may stem from a more aggressive pathological process or pronounced late-maturation abnormality, rather than an early premorbid impairment, suggesting an intervention target.
难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的病前阶段可能揭示潜在机制并为早期干预提供依据。根据神经发育假说,治疗抵抗可能与明显的发育障碍有关。我们研究了后来发展为TRS的儿童的学业成绩和出勤轨迹。
这项病例对照研究分析了1990年以后出生并在智利公共卫生系统开始使用氯氮平作为TRS替代指标的所有个体的平均绩点和出勤情况。对照组包括后来被诊断为治疗反应性精神分裂症、双相情感障碍的儿童以及未受影响的同学。线性混合模型考虑了个体和学校层面的混杂因素。
我们纳入了1072名后来被诊断为TRS的儿童(9929次观察,29.3%为女性)、323名精神分裂症患者(2802次观察,25.7%为女性)、175名双相情感障碍患者(1784次观察,53.8%为女性)以及273260名未受影响的同学(533335次观察,47%为女性)。后来发展为TRS的儿童在各年级的成绩比他们的同学差(-0.26标准差[-0.2,-0.4]),但比治疗反应性精神分裂症患者好。所有严重精神疾病组在后期学校阶段成绩均下降,TRS组的线性下降比治疗反应性精神分裂症组更陡(斜率为-0.03;95%置信区间-0.04,-0.01),二次下降比双相情感障碍组更陡(斜率为-0.005;-0.01,-0.001)。与同学相比,两组患精神分裂症的儿童的出勤率随时间下降。发展为TRS的儿童下降最为明显(与精神分裂症组相比为-0.03;-0.05,-0.01,与双相情感障碍组相比为-0.027;-0.049,-0.006)。
TRS可能源于更具侵袭性的病理过程或明显的晚期成熟异常,而非早期病前损害,这提示了一个干预靶点。