Suppr超能文献

F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI在胶质瘤复发中的应用:与C-蛋氨酸PET/MRI及对比增强MRI的比较

F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI in glioma recurrence: comparison with C-methionine PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI.

作者信息

Du Zhenwei, Luo Yi, Sun Jinju, Long He, You Jianping, Li Xin, Xu Lunshan, Zhang Weiguo, Chen Xiao

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Medical Engineering, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05159-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical utility of F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI relative to C-methionine (C-MET) PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for glioma recurrence detection.

METHODS

Patients with suspected recurrence of glioma were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent paired F-NOTA-NFB and C-MET PET/MRI. Diagnostic efficiency of glioma recurrence detection by different imaging methods were assessed and compared. The suspected lesions showed via F-NOTA-NFB and C-MET PET/MRI were compared by SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR). The diagnostic performance of F-NOTA-NFB and C-MET SUVmax/TBR was tested by receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with suspected recurrent glioma were included, with 28 positive for recurrent gliomas and 10 negative for recurrence which were confirmed by the pathology or clinical follow-up. For visual assessment, the accuracy and specificity of F-NOTA-NFB PET were equivalent to C-MET PET (accuracy: 92.11% vs. 94.74%, P = 1.00; specificity: 70.00% vs. 80.00%, P = 1.00) and higher than CE-MRI (accuracy: 92.11% vs. 76.32%, P = 0.031; specificity: 70.00% vs. 10.00%, P = 0.031). For quantitative analysis, in recurrent gliomas, F-NOTA-NFB PET revealed higher SUVmax (P = 0.007) and TBR (P = 0.002) than treatment-related effects, with higher TBR for recurrence than that of C-MET (P < 0.001). Although C-MET SUVmax had the highest AUC of 0.911 for detecting glioma recurrence, but with no significant difference relative to C-MET TBR (AUC = 0.889, P = 0.75), F-NOTA-NFB SUVmax (AUC = 0.793, P = 0.32), and F-NOTA-NFB TBR (AUC = 0.829, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic efficacy of F-NOTA-NFB PET or PET/MRI performed equivalent to C-MET PET or PET/MRI, and better than CE-MRI for diagnosis of recurrent gliomas. Compared to C-MET, F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI exhibited higher TBR, giving advantages in glioma delineation that might provide valuable information for making treatment strategy.

摘要

目的

探讨F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI相对于¹¹C-蛋氨酸(C-MET)PET/MRI及对比增强MRI(CE-MRI)在检测胶质瘤复发中的临床应用价值。

方法

前瞻性纳入疑似胶质瘤复发的患者。所有患者均接受F-NOTA-NFB和C-MET PET/MRI检查。评估并比较不同成像方法检测胶质瘤复发的诊断效能。通过SUVmax和肿瘤与本底比值(TBR)比较F-NOTA-NFB和C-MET PET/MRI显示的疑似病变。采用受试者操作特征曲线测试F-NOTA-NFB和C-MET SUVmax/TBR的诊断性能。

结果

纳入38例疑似复发性胶质瘤患者,其中28例复发性胶质瘤阳性,10例复发阴性,经病理或临床随访证实。视觉评估方面,F-NOTA-NFB PET的准确性和特异性与C-MET PET相当(准确性:92.11%对94.74%,P = 1.00;特异性:70.00%对80.00%,P = 1.00),且高于CE-MRI(准确性:92.11%对76.32%,P = 0.031;特异性:70.00%对10.00%,P = 0.031)。定量分析显示,在复发性胶质瘤中,F-NOTA-NFB PET显示的SUVmax(P = 有问题,原文应该是有数值的,但此处缺失)和TBR(P = 0.002)高于治疗相关效应,复发时的TBR高于C-MET(P < 0.001)。虽然C-MET SUVmax在检测胶质瘤复发时AUC最高,为0.911,但与C-MET TBR(AUC = 0.889,P = 0.75)、F-NOTA-NFB SUVmax(AUC = 0.793,P = 0.32)和F-NOTA-NFB TBR(AUC = 0.829,P = 0.42)相比无显著差异。

结论

F-NOTA-NFB PET或PET/MRI在诊断复发性胶质瘤方面的诊断效能与C-MET PET或PET/MRI相当,且优于CE-MRI。与C-MET相比,F-NOTA-NFB PET/MRI显示出更高的TBR,在胶质瘤勾画方面具有优势,可为制定治疗策略提供有价值的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验