• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期结直肠癌或肺癌早期诊断中频繁出现的漏诊情况。

Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal or Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Zimolzak Andrew J, Kapadia Paarth, Upadhyay Divvy K, Korukonda Saritha, Murugaesh Rekha Riyaa, Mushtaq Umair, Mir Usman, Murphy Daniel R, Offner Alexis, Mounce Luke T A, Abel Gary A, Lyratzopoulos Georgios, Singh Hardeep

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2875.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2875
PMID:40690229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12281389/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Missed and delayed cancer diagnoses worsen patient outcomes. Overlooking cancer-related diagnostic signals may result in advanced-stage presentations.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and implement a digital quality measure of the proportion of advanced-stage cancer diagnoses in the US and assess the rate of missed diagnostic opportunities.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used electronic health records and a cancer registry of patients with cancer diagnosed from 2016 to 2020 at 2 integrated health care systems, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system and Geisinger Health System. Patients with incident colorectal cancer (CRC) or non-small cell lung cancer, with at least 1 primary care visit in the 2 years before cancer diagnosis, were included. A random sample of 100 advanced-stage cases per cancer type and health system was manually reviewed using a 2-year look-back period. Data were analyzed from January 27 to June 9, 2025.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a digital quality measure for advanced stage cancer and a descriptive analysis (by health system and cancer type) of the rate of missed opportunities in diagnosis, dates of investigation initiation and completion, and factors associated with missed opportunities.

RESULTS

There were 37 691 patients from the VA health system and 2914 patients from Geisinger with lung cancer, and there were 14 674 patients from the VA health system and 627 patients from Geisinger with CRC. For lung cancer, the advanced stage comprised 45.9% at the VA health system and 58.3% at Geisinger. Advanced CRC stage was 33.2% at the VA health system and 36.2% at Geisinger. Notably, 58.9% (95% CI, 48.6%-68.5%) of patients from the VA health system and 77.8% (95% CI, 68.6%-84.8%) of patients from Geisinger with advanced-stage lung cancer had missed opportunities in diagnosis. For CRC, 66.3% (95% CI, 56.3%-75.0%) of patients at the VA health system and 69.7% (95% CI, 60.0%-77.9%) of patients at Geisinger had missed opportunities. Patients with missed opportunities had notable delays in diagnosis (eg, the median time from diagnostic signal to workup completion ranged from 1 to 20 months). Lack of screening was associated with 6.1% to 16.7% of late-stage cancers across health systems and cancer types. For lung cancer, missed opportunities were associated with problems in patient-clinician encounters and performing and interpreting diagnostic tests. For CRC, missed opportunities were primarily associated with patient-related factors and problems performing and interpreting diagnostic tests.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found high rates of missed diagnostic opportunities among patients with advanced-stage cancer. By using advanced stage as a digital quality measure, health systems, payers, and other stakeholders can better identify care gaps and track initiatives to reduce preventable delays in cancer diagnosis.

摘要

重要性

癌症诊断的遗漏和延迟会使患者的治疗结果恶化。忽视与癌症相关的诊断信号可能导致癌症晚期确诊。

目的

制定并实施一项关于美国癌症晚期诊断比例的数字质量指标,并评估诊断机会遗漏率。

设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究使用了电子健康记录以及退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗系统和盖辛格医疗系统这两个综合医疗系统中2016年至2020年被诊断为癌症的患者的癌症登记信息。纳入了在癌症诊断前两年内至少有一次初级保健就诊记录的新发结直肠癌(CRC)或非小细胞肺癌患者。对每个癌症类型和医疗系统随机抽取的100例晚期病例进行为期两年的回顾性人工审查。于2025年1月27日至6月9日对数据进行分析。

主要结局和指标

主要结局是癌症晚期的数字质量指标,以及对诊断机会遗漏率、调查开始和完成日期以及与诊断机会遗漏相关因素的描述性分析(按医疗系统和癌症类型)。

结果

VA医疗系统中有37691例肺癌患者,盖辛格医疗系统中有2914例;VA医疗系统中有14674例CRC患者,盖辛格医疗系统中有627例。对于肺癌,VA医疗系统的晚期比例为45.9%,盖辛格医疗系统为58.3%。VA医疗系统中晚期CRC比例为33.2%,盖辛格医疗系统为36.2%。值得注意的是,VA医疗系统中58.9%(95%CI,48.6%-68.5%)的晚期肺癌患者和盖辛格医疗系统中77.8%(95%CI,68.6%-84.8%)的晚期肺癌患者存在诊断机会遗漏。对于CRC,VA医疗系统中66.3%(95%CI,56.3%-75.0%)的患者和盖辛格医疗系统中69.7%(95%CI,60.0%-77.9%)的患者存在诊断机会遗漏。存在诊断机会遗漏的患者诊断明显延迟(例如,从诊断信号到检查完成的中位时间为1至20个月)。在各个医疗系统和癌症类型中,缺乏筛查与6.1%至16.7%的晚期癌症相关。对于肺癌,诊断机会遗漏与医患接触以及进行和解释诊断检查方面的问题有关。对于CRC,诊断机会遗漏主要与患者相关因素以及进行和解释诊断检查方面的问题有关。

结论和意义

本研究发现晚期癌症患者中诊断机会遗漏率很高。通过将晚期作为数字质量指标,医疗系统、支付方和其他利益相关者可以更好地识别护理差距,并跟踪旨在减少可预防的癌症诊断延迟的举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7536/12668359/311125af8002/nihms-2112302-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7536/12668359/311125af8002/nihms-2112302-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7536/12668359/311125af8002/nihms-2112302-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal or Lung Cancer.晚期结直肠癌或肺癌早期诊断中频繁出现的漏诊情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2875.
2
A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.错失检验结果的虚拟突破系列协作:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440269. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40269.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
5
Strategies for detecting colon cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病患者结肠癌的检测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub4.
6
Comorbidities, Socioeconomic Status, and Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Route.合并症、社会经济地位与结直肠癌诊断途径
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8867.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.术中冰冻切片分析用于诊断可疑盆腔肿块中的早期卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 1;3(3):CD010360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010360.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis.急诊癌症诊断数字质量指标的开发与实施
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 20;42(21):2506-2515. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01523. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.开发电子临床质量指标以评估癌症诊断过程。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Aug 18;30(9):1526-1531. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad089.
3
Perspectives of Patients About Immediate Access to Test Results Through an Online Patient Portal.
患者对通过在线患者门户即时获取检验结果的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233572. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3572.
4
Adherence to National Guidelines for Timeliness of Test Results Communication to Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.遵守退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中及时向患者传达检验结果的国家指南。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8568.
5
Socio-demographic variation in stage at diagnosis of breast, bladder, colon, endometrial, lung, melanoma, prostate, rectal, renal and ovarian cancer in England and its population impact.英国各年龄段人群乳腺癌、膀胱癌、结肠癌、子宫内膜癌、肺癌、黑色素瘤、前列腺癌、直肠癌、肾癌和卵巢癌诊断时的社会人口学差异及其对人群的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Mar;124(7):1320-1329. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01279-z. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
The frequency, nature and impact of GP-assessed avoidable delays in a population-based cohort of cancer patients.基于人群的癌症患者队列中全科医生评估的可避免延迟的频率、性质和影响。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;64:101617. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101617. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
7
2019 Update on Medical Overuse: A Review.《2019年医疗过度使用最新情况综述》
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1568-1574. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3842.
8
Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms.合并的慢性疾病与癌症诊断:疾病特异性影响和潜在机制。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;16(12):746-761. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0249-6. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
9
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety.关于使用修订后的更安全诊断工具来帮助衡量和提高诊断安全性的建议。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):315-323. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0012.
10
With equal access, African American patients have superior survival compared to white patients with multiple myeloma: a VA study.一项退伍军人事务部的研究表明,在接受同等治疗的情况下,非裔美国骨髓瘤患者比白人患者的生存率更高。
Blood. 2019 Jun 13;133(24):2615-2618. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000406. Epub 2019 Apr 19.