• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用行为理论和机器学习预测人类决策。

Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.

作者信息

Plonsky Ori, Apel Reut, Ert Eyal, Tennenholtz Moshe, Bourgin David, Peterson Joshua C, Reichman Daniel, Griffiths Thomas L, Russell Stuart J, Carter Even C, Cavanagh James F, Erev Ido

机构信息

Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02267-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-025-02267-6
PMID:40691307
Abstract

Predicting human decisions under risk and uncertainty remains a fundamental challenge across disciplines. Existing models often struggle even in highly stylized tasks like choice between lotteries. Here we introduce BEAST gradient boosting (BEAST-GB), a hybrid model integrating behavioural theory (BEAST) with machine learning. We first present CPC18, a competition for predicting risky choice, in which BEAST-GB won. Then, using two large datasets, we demonstrate that BEAST-GB predicts more accurately than neural networks trained on extensive data and dozens of existing behavioural models. BEAST-GB also generalizes robustly across unseen experimental contexts, surpassing direct empirical generalization, and helps to refine and improve the behavioural theory itself. Our analyses highlight the potential of anchoring predictions on behavioural theory even in data-rich settings and even when the theory alone falters. Our results underscore how integrating machine learning with theoretical frameworks, especially those-like BEAST-designed for prediction, can improve our ability to predict and understand human behaviour.

摘要

预测人类在风险和不确定性下的决策仍然是跨学科的一项基本挑战。现有模型即使在诸如彩票选择等高度程式化的任务中也常常面临困难。在此,我们引入了BEAST梯度提升(BEAST-GB),这是一种将行为理论(BEAST)与机器学习相结合的混合模型。我们首先介绍了CPC18,这是一项预测风险选择的竞赛,BEAST-GB在其中获胜。然后,使用两个大型数据集,我们证明BEAST-GB的预测比在大量数据上训练的神经网络以及数十种现有的行为模型更准确。BEAST-GB还能在未见的实验情境中稳健泛化,超越直接的经验泛化,并有助于完善和改进行为理论本身。我们的分析突出了即使在数据丰富的环境中,甚至当理论本身表现不佳时,将预测锚定在行为理论上的潜力。我们的结果强调了将机器学习与理论框架相结合,尤其是像BEAST这样为预测而设计的框架,如何能够提高我们预测和理解人类行为的能力。

相似文献

1
Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.运用行为理论和机器学习预测人类决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02267-6.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study.用于评估、选择和解释2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病结局机器学习模型的责任框架:方法与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 27;13:e66200. doi: 10.2196/66200.
4
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
6
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
Differential Predictability of Preterm Birth Types: Strong Signals for Indicated Cases versus Limited Success in Spontaneous Preterm Birth.早产类型的差异可预测性:指征性病例的强信号与自发性早产的有限成功率
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 10:2025.07.09.25329712. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.09.25329712.

本文引用的文献

1
Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?与最大化相悖的偏差:环境特异性偏差,还是人类学习基本属性的反映?
Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr;130(3):640-676. doi: 10.1037/rev0000415.
2
Humans as intuitive classifiers.作为直观分类者的人类。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1041737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041737. eCollection 2022.
3
The elusiveness of context effects in decision making.决策中情境效应的难以捉摸性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;25(10):843-854. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.计算社会科学中的解释与预测融合。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):181-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Using large-scale experiments and machine learning to discover theories of human decision-making.利用大规模实验和机器学习发现人类决策理论。
Science. 2021 Jun 11;372(6547):1209-1214. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2629.
6
Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.通过科学后悔最小化扩大心理学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 21;117(16):8825-8835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915841117. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
7
Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.前景理论反映了注意力的选择性分配。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Feb;147(2):147-169. doi: 10.1037/xge0000406.
8
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
9
Who Dares, Who Errs? Disentangling Cognitive and Motivational Roots of Age Differences in Decisions Under Risk.谁敢于冒险,谁又会犯错?风险决策中年龄差异的认知和动机根源解析。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):504-518. doi: 10.1177/0956797616687729. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
From anomalies to forecasts: Toward a descriptive model of decisions under risk, under ambiguity, and from experience.从异常到预测:迈向风险、模糊性及经验性决策的描述模型。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Jul;124(4):369-409. doi: 10.1037/rev0000062. Epub 2017 Mar 9.