• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。

Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1177/1745691617693393
PMID:28841086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6603289/
Abstract

Psychology has historically been concerned, first and foremost, with explaining the causal mechanisms that give rise to behavior. Randomized, tightly controlled experiments are enshrined as the gold standard of psychological research, and there are endless investigations of the various mediating and moderating variables that govern various behaviors. We argue that psychology's near-total focus on explaining the causes of behavior has led much of the field to be populated by research programs that provide intricate theories of psychological mechanism but that have little (or unknown) ability to predict future behaviors with any appreciable accuracy. We propose that principles and techniques from the field of machine learning can help psychology become a more predictive science. We review some of the fundamental concepts and tools of machine learning and point out examples where these concepts have been used to conduct interesting and important psychological research that focuses on predictive research questions. We suggest that an increased focus on prediction, rather than explanation, can ultimately lead us to greater understanding of behavior.

摘要

心理学历史上首先关注的是解释导致行为的因果机制。随机、严格控制的实验被奉为心理学研究的金标准,人们对各种中介和调节变量进行了无休止的研究,这些变量控制着各种行为。我们认为,心理学几乎完全专注于解释行为的原因,这导致该领域的大部分研究项目都提供了关于心理机制的复杂理论,但几乎没有(或未知)能力以任何可衡量的准确性预测未来的行为。我们提出,机器学习领域的原理和技术可以帮助心理学成为一门更具预测性的科学。我们回顾了机器学习的一些基本概念和工具,并指出了这些概念在哪些地方被用于进行有趣且重要的关注预测性研究问题的心理学研究。我们认为,更多地关注预测而非解释最终可以使我们更好地理解行为。

相似文献

1
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
How Can Big Data Science Transform the Psychological Sciences?大数据科学如何改变心理科学?
Span J Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;23:e44. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.45.
4
Prediction of Online Psychological Help-Seeking Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interpretable Machine Learning Method.预测 COVID-19 大流行期间的在线心理求助行为:一种可解释的机器学习方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;10:814366. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.814366. eCollection 2022.
5
Machine Learning and Psychological Research: The Unexplored Effect of Measurement.机器学习与心理研究:测量的未知效应
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):809-816. doi: 10.1177/1745691620902467. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
What can qualitative psychology contribute to psychological knowledge?质化心理学对心理学知识有何贡献?
Psychol Methods. 2019 Dec;24(6):796-804. doi: 10.1037/met0000218. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.重新思考天赋和英才教育:基于心理科学的前进方向建议。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011 Jan;12(1):3-54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056.
9
What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?三种不同机器学习技术预测肩关节置换术后临床结果的准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2351-2363. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001263.
10
A direct comparison of theory-driven and machine learning prediction of suicide: A meta-analysis.基于理论和机器学习的自杀预测的直接比较:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 12;16(4):e0249833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249833. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
What values best distinguish the world's cultures? The machine learning-based cultural values inventory.哪些价值观最能区分世界上的各种文化?基于机器学习的文化价值观量表。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf229. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf229. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
AI and Machine Learning Terminology in Medicine, Psychology, and Social Sciences: Tutorial and Practical Recommendations.医学、心理学和社会科学中的人工智能与机器学习术语:教程与实用建议
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e66100. doi: 10.2196/66100.
3
Constructing a binary prediction model with incomplete data: Variable selection to balance fairness and precision.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power.一个以上随机因素的实验:设计、分析模型和统计功效。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:601-625. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 neuroticism-associated loci.对超过106000人进行的全基因组分析确定了9个与神经质相关的基因座。
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;21(11):1644. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.177. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.
构建具有不完整数据的二元预测模型:平衡公平性和精度的变量选择。
Psychol Methods. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1037/met0000786.
4
Weak and unstable prediction of personality from the structural connectome.基于结构连接组对人格进行的预测薄弱且不稳定。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 3;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00416. eCollection 2025.
5
The Voxelwise Encoding Model framework: A tutorial introduction to fitting encoding models to fMRI data.体素编码模型框架:将编码模型拟合到功能磁共振成像数据的教程介绍。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 9;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00575. eCollection 2025.
6
Time-varying functional connectivity as Wishart processes.作为威沙特过程的时变功能连接性。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jun 5;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00184. eCollection 2024.
7
What matters most? Identifying key resource gain and loss factors affecting nurses' work engagement and job burnout in digital healthcare contexts.最重要的是什么?识别影响数字医疗环境中护士工作投入和职业倦怠的关键资源获取和损失因素。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 29;24(1):985. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03586-9.
8
Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.运用行为理论和机器学习预测人类决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02267-6.
9
Can I trust this paper?我能信任这篇论文吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02740-3.
10
Neither measurement error nor speed-accuracy trade-offs explain the difficulty of establishing attentional control as a psychometric construct: Evidence from a latent-variable analysis using diffusion modeling.测量误差和速度-准确性权衡都无法解释将注意力控制确立为一种心理测量结构的困难:来自使用扩散模型的潜变量分析的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02696-4.
对混杂结构进行统计控制比你想象的要难。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719. eCollection 2016.
4
Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences.使用套索法进行预测变量选择并缓解过度拟合:行为科学中长期被忽视的一种方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):471-84. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1036965.
5
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
6
Interactions between donor Agreeableness and recipient characteristics in predicting charitable donation and positive social evaluation.捐赠者的宜人性与受赠者特征在预测慈善捐赠和积极社会评价方面的相互作用。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 18;3:e1089. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1089. eCollection 2015.
7
The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto.智能手机心理学宣言。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):221-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691612441215.
8
There Is Nothing So Theoretical as a Good Method.再好的方法也没有理论重要。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;7(2):99-108. doi: 10.1177/1745691611434210. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.为什么科学并非必然自我纠错
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):645-54. doi: 10.1177/1745691612464056.
10
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research.纯粹确证性研究议程
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463078.