Bruggisser Fabienne, Knaier Raphael, Schoch Raphael, Infanger Denis, Niemeyer Max, Schmidt-Trucksäss Arno, Wagner Jonathan
Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department Medicine, Training and Health, Institute of Sports Science and Motologie, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09900-4.
This study investigated the added value of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O) measurements during a 4-min time trial (4TT) or a 3-min all-out test (3MT) as compared to a ramp cycling test to enhance sport-specific performance assessment. Data from two cross-sectional studies were analysed. In study 1, 18 male and 13 female recreational cyclists performed two ramp tests and two 4TT on different days. In study 2, 23 male and 17 female CrossFit athletes performed one ramp test followed by a 3MT with an intervening 20-min recovery. The tolerance limits for ∆[Formula: see text]O between the two exercise tests was set to ± 0.13 L·min, reflecting common day-to-day variation in [Formula: see text]O. In study 1, comparing the first ramp test with the first 4TT and comparing the second ramp test with the second 4TT showed mean differences of 0.02 L·min (p = 0.930) and 0.03 L·min (p = 0.873), respectively. However, the tolerance limits were - 0.35-0.31 L·min and - 0.36-0.42 L·min, respectively. In study 2, the mean difference and tolerance limits were 0.08 L·min (p = 0.637) and - 0.42-0.58 L·min. Although the 4TT and 3MT show limited agreement with ramp tests for [Formula: see text]O, the lack of systematic deviations supports their value for sport-specific performance assessment.
本研究调查了与递增负荷骑行测试相比,4分钟计时赛(4TT)或3分钟全力测试(3MT)期间峰值摄氧量([公式:见正文]O)测量在增强特定运动表现评估方面的附加价值。对两项横断面研究的数据进行了分析。在研究1中,18名男性和13名女性休闲自行车运动员在不同日期进行了两次递增负荷测试和两次4TT。在研究2中,23名男性和17名女性CrossFit运动员进行了一次递增负荷测试,随后进行了一次3MT,并在其间进行了20分钟的恢复。两次运动测试之间∆[公式:见正文]O的公差限值设定为±0.13L·min,反映了[公式:见正文]O的日常常见变化。在研究1中,将第一次递增负荷测试与第一次4TT进行比较,以及将第二次递增负荷测试与第二次4TT进行比较,平均差异分别为0.02L·min(p = 0.930)和0.03L·min(p = 0.873)。然而,公差限值分别为-0.35-0.31L·min和-0.36-0.42L·min。在研究2中,平均差异和公差限值分别为0.08L·min(p = 0.637)和-0.42-0.58L·min。尽管4TT和3MT在[公式:见正文]O方面与递增负荷测试的一致性有限,但缺乏系统偏差支持了它们在特定运动表现评估中的价值。