• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能技术在预测土壤侵蚀模式中的应用。

Application of smart technologies for predicting soil erosion patterns.

作者信息

Ikram Rana Muhammad Adnan, Wang Mo, Moayedi Hossein, Ahmadi Dehrashid Atefeh, Gharibi Shiva, Han Jing-Cheng

机构信息

WaterScience and Environmental Research Centre, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

Center for Global Health Research, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, 600001, India.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12125-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-12125-0
PMID:40691718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12279979/
Abstract

Soil is a critical natural resource, and accurate erosion susceptibility assessment is vital for the optimal management and development of soil resources. Erosion susceptibility assessment is necessary for long-term conservation plans, but the process can be expensive and time-consuming over large areas. It is imperative to examine the impact of water-induced erosion on cultivated lands, as it can cause significant damage. This study evaluates the effectiveness of four data-driven approaches (biogeography-based optimization, earthworm optimization algorithm, symbiotic organisms search, and whale optimization algorithm) combined with artificial neural network models for the assessment of erosion susceptibility. The examined criteria include 14 geographic and environmental criteria, and the data used in a ratio of 70 to 30 for training and testing operations. And its results were measured by AUC values. The evaluation of AUC accuracy indices revealed compelling results. Specifically, in the case of SOS-MLP, the highest AUC values were observed, reaching 0.9973 for test data and 0.9296 for train data. Conversely, for WOA-MLP, the AUC values obtained were slightly lower but still notable, registering at 0.9809 for test data and 0.959 for train data. These values were also calculated for BBO-MLP (0.999 and 0.9327) and EWA-MLP (0.9304 and 0.9296) in the training and testing phases, respectively. Results showed that all four methods could successfully evaluate erosion susceptibility according to AUC values greater than 0.92, especially the BBO-MLP with the highest AUC values. Therefore, the findings of this study have shown that the combined optimization algorithms and Machine Learning used in this research have a suitable ability to optimize the artificial neural network and are very useful for identifying areas sensitive to erosion.

摘要

土壤是一种至关重要的自然资源,准确的土壤侵蚀敏感性评估对于土壤资源的优化管理和开发至关重要。侵蚀敏感性评估对于长期保护计划是必要的,但在大面积区域进行该过程可能既昂贵又耗时。研究水蚀对耕地的影响势在必行,因为它可能造成重大破坏。本研究评估了四种数据驱动方法(基于生物地理学的优化、蚯蚓优化算法、共生生物搜索和鲸鱼优化算法)与人工神经网络模型相结合用于评估侵蚀敏感性的有效性。所考察的标准包括14个地理和环境标准,并且所使用的数据按70比30的比例用于训练和测试操作。其结果通过AUC值来衡量。对AUC准确性指标的评估显示出令人信服的结果。具体而言,在SOS-MLP的情况下,观察到最高的AUC值,测试数据达到0.9973,训练数据达到0.9296。相反,对于WOA-MLP,获得的AUC值略低但仍然显著,测试数据为0.9809,训练数据为0.959。在训练和测试阶段,还分别计算了BBO-MLP(0.999和0.9327)和EWA-MLP(0.9304和0.9296)的这些值。结果表明,所有四种方法根据大于0.92的AUC值都能成功评估侵蚀敏感性,特别是BBO-MLP的AUC值最高。因此,本研究的结果表明,本研究中使用的组合优化算法和机器学习具有优化人工神经网络的合适能力,并且对于识别对侵蚀敏感的区域非常有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/8441eb17c7fb/41598_2025_12125_Fig16a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/17a04511563b/41598_2025_12125_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/f5ee22a24c7f/41598_2025_12125_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/40928471c77b/41598_2025_12125_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/ce15062cd810/41598_2025_12125_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/6c67d95766f4/41598_2025_12125_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/47501d78b8d0/41598_2025_12125_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/be96b1b564bc/41598_2025_12125_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/965db093f86e/41598_2025_12125_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/6aecc013b8ed/41598_2025_12125_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/1ecc13189d9e/41598_2025_12125_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/88d7ccfdf0cb/41598_2025_12125_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/3f32eb2e64e4/41598_2025_12125_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/9bccddaeef84/41598_2025_12125_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/46fc4f13deb7/41598_2025_12125_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/22fa20026262/41598_2025_12125_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/8441eb17c7fb/41598_2025_12125_Fig16a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/17a04511563b/41598_2025_12125_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/f5ee22a24c7f/41598_2025_12125_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/40928471c77b/41598_2025_12125_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/ce15062cd810/41598_2025_12125_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/6c67d95766f4/41598_2025_12125_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/47501d78b8d0/41598_2025_12125_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/be96b1b564bc/41598_2025_12125_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/965db093f86e/41598_2025_12125_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/6aecc013b8ed/41598_2025_12125_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/1ecc13189d9e/41598_2025_12125_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/88d7ccfdf0cb/41598_2025_12125_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/3f32eb2e64e4/41598_2025_12125_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/9bccddaeef84/41598_2025_12125_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/46fc4f13deb7/41598_2025_12125_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/22fa20026262/41598_2025_12125_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57ca/12279979/8441eb17c7fb/41598_2025_12125_Fig16a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of smart technologies for predicting soil erosion patterns.智能技术在预测土壤侵蚀模式中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12125-0.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
3
Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.用于血尿调查的诊断测试和算法:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. doi: 10.3310/hta10180.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

本文引用的文献

1
Credal decision tree based novel ensemble models for spatial assessment of gully erosion and sustainable management.基于可信决策树的新型集成模型在沟蚀空间评估和可持续管理中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82527-3.
2
Mapping wind erosion hazard with regression-based machine learning algorithms.基于回归的机器学习算法进行风蚀危害制图。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 24;10(1):20494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77567-0.
3
Novel Ensemble Approach of Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) Model and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm for Prediction of Gully Erosion Susceptibility.
基于深度学习神经网络(DLNN)模型和粒子群优化(PSO)算法的新型集成方法在沟蚀敏感性预测中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 30;20(19):5609. doi: 10.3390/s20195609.
4
Predicting the spatiotemporal variation in soil wind erosion across Central Asia in response to climate change in the 21st century.预测 21 世纪气候变化下中亚土壤风蚀的时空变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 20;709:136060. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136060. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
A Novel Ensemble Artificial Intelligence Approach for Gully Erosion Mapping in a Semi-Arid Watershed (Iran).一种用于半干旱流域(伊朗)沟壑侵蚀制图的新型集成人工智能方法
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 29;19(11):2444. doi: 10.3390/s19112444.