Guhr Tobias, Song Zhiwei, Andersen Albert G, de la Cruz Jiménez Juan, Pedersen Ole
Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Bonn, Regina-Pacis-Weg 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Ann Bot. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaf152.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is widely grown in regions prone to both drought and flooding conditions. Although root responses to drought and flooding have been extensively studied separately, studies comparing key anatomical root traits in wheat under both conditions side-by-side are rarely studied. We tested the hypothesis that wheat roots respond similarly to both drought and flooding, despite these being contrasting water regimes.
Two wheat cultivars ('Jackson' and 'Frument') were grown hydroponically under control conditions, drought and flooding and the responses in plant growth, root morphology, root anatomy, development of apoplastic barriers, and their capacity to reduce radial water loss were measured.
Xylem-to-stele ratio (XSR) decreased by 33 % under water stress compared to control conditions, whereas aerenchyma-to-cortex ratio (ACR) increased 2.1-fold during both drought and flooding compared to controls. Compared to control conditions, lateral root growth was more reduced than adventitious root growth, 86 % and 67 %, respectively, under both types of water stress. There was comparably stunted root and shoot growth under water stress and adventitious roots grew similarly slower and to one third of length compared to control conditions. Our findings did not indicate differences in soil flooding tolerances between the two cultivars.
We conclude that different underlying physical processes during contrasting water regimes, e.g. water limitation during drought and oxygen deficiency during flooding, result in similar root responses, e.g. increased relative aerenchyma area, lignin and suberin deposition in the endodermis and decreased lateral-to-adventitious root length. Future research should provide a more comprehensive understanding of cross-stress effects on root morphology, anatomy and physiology.
小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)广泛种植于易受干旱和洪涝影响的地区。尽管根系对干旱和洪涝的响应已分别得到广泛研究,但很少有研究将这两种条件下小麦关键的根系解剖特征进行并列比较。我们检验了这样一个假设,即尽管干旱和洪涝是截然不同的水分状况,但小麦根系对它们的响应相似。
在对照条件、干旱和洪涝条件下,水培种植两个小麦品种(‘Jackson’和‘Frument’),并测定植株生长、根系形态、根系解剖结构、质外体屏障的发育以及它们减少径向水分损失的能力。
与对照条件相比,水分胁迫下木质部与中柱比(XSR)降低了33%,而在干旱和洪涝期间,通气组织与皮层比(ACR)相比对照增加了2.1倍。与对照条件相比,在两种水分胁迫下,侧根生长比不定根生长受抑制更严重,分别为86%和67%。在水分胁迫下,根和地上部生长同样受到抑制,不定根生长同样比对照条件下慢,长度仅为对照的三分之一。我们的研究结果未表明这两个品种在耐土壤淹水能力上存在差异。
我们得出结论,在不同的水分状况下,例如干旱期间的水分限制和洪涝期间的缺氧,不同的潜在物理过程导致了相似的根系响应,例如相对通气组织面积增加、内皮层木质素和栓质沉积以及侧根与不定根长度比降低。未来的研究应更全面地了解交叉胁迫对根系形态、解剖结构和生理的影响。