• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[鼻息肉慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦支架植入的时机及短期临床疗效评估]

[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].

作者信息

Zhou H Q, Tan L, Liu P Q, Xu Y

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Research Institute of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, Wuhan 430060, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 7;60(6):638-645. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252
PMID:40692229
Abstract

To assess the optimal timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus drug-eluting stent placement in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The minimum sample size was calculated using G-power 3.1.9.7 software. From March 2021 and May 2023, a total of 114 eligible patients with CRSwNP were recruited in this study at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the control group, the intraoperative stent group, and the postoperative stent group. In the intraoperative stent group, drug-eluting stents were implanted during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), while patients in the postoperative stent group received drug-eluting stent 2 weeks after ESS, following routine debridement of the surgical cavity. Bilateral ethmoid sinus stenting was performed for both stent groups, while the control group only underwent ESS with standard postoperative cavity debridement. All subjects were followed up at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Nasal symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and endoscopic evaluations of the ethmoid cavity-assessing obstruction, crusting, polypoid mucosal changes, epithelialization of ethmoid cavity, need for intervention, and complications such as middle turbinate lateralization and adhesions-were collected to evaluate the treatment efficacy of three groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyze continuous variables among the three groups, and chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Among 114 CRSwNP patients, 21 lost follow-up patients and 7 postoperative oral corticosteroid intervention patients were excluded. Finally, 86 patients were included in the analysis, including 45 males and 41 females, aged 18-65 years. The cohort comprised 29 in the control group, 29 in the intraoperative stent group, and 28 in the postoperative stent group. Successful bilateral ethmoid sinus stent implantation was achieved in both stent groups. At 4 weeks postoperatively, compared with the control group, both stent groups showed significant improvements in nasal congestion and rhinorrhea scores (<0.05). At 8 weeks, the postoperative group continued to demonstrate superior outcomes in these two symptoms (both <0.05), while the intraoperative group only showed significant improvement in nasal congestion (<0.05). No significant differences were observed in facial pressure, olfactory loss, or nasal dryness scores among the three groups (all >0.05). Endoscopic evaluation revealed that both stent groups had significant improvements in ethmoid sinus obstruction scores at 4 weeks compared with the control group, with the postoperative group maintaining this advantage at 8 weeks (<0.05). At 2 weeks, the intraoperative stent group had higher crusting scores than other groups (<0.05). At 2 weeks after stent implantation, the postoperative stent group had significantly lower crusting scores than the intraoperative stent group (<0.001). The intraoperative group had a significantly lower incidence of ethmoid sinus edema and polypoid changes at 4 weeks compared with the control group (<0.05), while the postoperative group showed reduced rates of these pathological changes at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (all <0.05). The postoperative stent group had significantly higher rates of ethmoid sinus mucosal epithelialization at 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively compared with the control group. The intraoperative stent group required fewer interventions than the control group at both 8 and 12 weeks, while the postoperative stent group maintained lower interventions rates at all follow-up points after implantation (all <0.05). Additionally, the incidence of complications was significantly lower in both stent groups compared with the control group (<0.05). Overall, stent implantation at different time points showed similar efficacy, with the postoperative group demonstrating more stable outcomes and less crusting/coagulation formation compared with the intraoperative group. The implantation of corticosteroid sinus stents in the ethmoid sinuses effectively controls postoperative inflammation, promotes mucosal epithelialization, and reduces postoperative intervention rates. Stent implantation two weeks after surgery is feasible. Adjusting the timing of stent placement can minimize crust formation and maximize the corticosteroid effect, thereby facilitating a benign course of the surgical site.

摘要

评估鼻窦药物洗脱支架置入术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者的最佳时机及短期临床疗效。使用G-power 3.1.9.7软件计算最小样本量。2021年3月至2023年5月,武汉大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科共招募了114例符合条件的CRSwNP患者。患者被随机分为三组:对照组、术中支架组和术后支架组。术中支架组在内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)期间植入药物洗脱支架,而术后支架组在ESS术后2周,在术腔常规清创后接受药物洗脱支架植入。两个支架组均进行双侧筛窦支架置入,而对照组仅接受ESS及标准的术后术腔清创。所有受试者在术后2、4、8和12周进行随访。收集鼻症状视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及筛窦腔的内镜评估结果,评估阻塞、结痂、息肉样黏膜改变、筛窦腔上皮化、干预需求以及中鼻甲外移和粘连等并发症,以评估三组的治疗效果。使用GraphPad Prism 9进行统计分析。应用方差分析(ANOVA)分析三组间的连续变量,使用卡方检验分析分类变量。在114例CRSwNP患者中,21例失访患者和7例术后口服糖皮质激素干预患者被排除。最终,86例患者纳入分析,其中男性45例,女性41例,年龄18 - 65岁。队列包括对照组29例、术中支架组29例和术后支架组28例。两个支架组均成功完成双侧筛窦支架植入。术后4周,与对照组相比,两个支架组的鼻塞和流涕评分均有显著改善(<0.05)。8周时,术后组在这两个症状方面继续显示出更好的结果(均<0.05),而术中组仅在鼻塞方面有显著改善(<0.05)。三组在面部压痛、嗅觉减退或鼻干评分方面均未观察到显著差异(均>0.05)。内镜评估显示,与对照组相比,两个支架组在术后4周时筛窦阻塞评分均有显著改善,术后组在8周时保持这一优势(<0.05)。术后2周,术中支架组的结痂评分高于其他组(<0.05)。支架植入术后2周,术后支架组的结痂评分显著低于术中支架组(<0.001)。与对照组相比,术中组在术后4周时筛窦水肿和息肉样改变的发生率显著降低(<0.05),而术后组在术后4、8和12周时这些病理改变的发生率均降低(均<0.05)。术后支架组在术后8周和12周时筛窦黏膜上皮化率显著高于对照组。术中支架组在8周和12周时的干预需求均少于对照组,而术后支架组在植入后的所有随访点均保持较低的干预率(均<0.05)。此外,两个支架组的并发症发生率均显著低于对照组(<0.05)。总体而言,不同时间点的支架植入显示出相似的疗效,与术中组相比,术后组的结果更稳定,结痂/凝血形成更少。在筛窦中植入糖皮质激素鼻窦支架可有效控制术后炎症,促进黏膜上皮化,并降低术后干预率。术后两周植入支架是可行的。调整支架置入时机可减少结痂形成并最大化糖皮质激素效果,从而促进手术部位的良性转归。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of timing and short-term clinical efficacy of sinus stent implantation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].[鼻息肉慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦支架植入的时机及短期临床疗效评估]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 7;60(6):638-645. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250425-00252.
2
Equivalent healthcare resource use following either a long-acting steroid-eluting implant or repeat endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyp recurrence: a real-world evidence study.长效类固醇洗脱植入物或重复内镜手术治疗鼻息肉复发的慢性鼻窦炎患者后的等效医疗资源使用情况:一项真实世界证据研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 May;41(5):767-777. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2513955. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
[Efficacy of glucocorticoid stent implantation in ethmoid sinus after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].[糖皮质激素支架植入在鼻息肉型慢性鼻窦炎鼻内镜鼻窦手术后筛窦的疗效]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr;37(4):252-257. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.003.
4
Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的全身及局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011994.pub2.
5
Short-course oral steroids alone for chronic rhinosinusitis.短期口服类固醇单独用于慢性鼻窦炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011991.pub2.
6
Oral and intranasal aspirin desensitisation for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease.用于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)诱发的呼吸道疾病的口服和鼻内阿司匹林脱敏疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 7;1(1):CD013476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013476.pub2.
7
Superior Benefits of Combining Mepolizumab With Sinus Surgery Compared to Mepolizumab Alone: Results From a Randomised 6-Month Trial.与单独使用美泊利单抗相比,美泊利单抗联合鼻窦手术的卓越优势:一项为期6个月的随机试验结果
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 Jul;15(7):724-733. doi: 10.1002/alr.23562. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
8
Short-course oral steroids as an adjunct therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.短期口服类固醇作为慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的辅助治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011992.pub2.
9
Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis.鼻内用类固醇与安慰剂或不干预治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011996.pub2.
10
The efficacy and safety of several interventions of corticosteroids for CRSwNP patients after endoscope sinus surgery: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.内镜鼻窦手术后慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者几种皮质类固醇干预措施的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 18;101(46):e31831. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031831.