van Tulleken Christoffer
Division of Infection, University College London, London.
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jun 30;12(2):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100263. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The global pandemic of diet-related disease is increasingly recognised as driven by financial incentives in the food system which drive the marketing and consumption of harmful food, including ultra-processed food (UPF). Despite international consensus on the harms of UPF and the adoption of precautionary policies by organisations such as WHO, UNICEF and governments in Latin America, UK policy response remains compromised by widespread conflicts of interest. These conflicts exist across government agencies, regulatory bodies, academia and media institutions, many of which are directly or indirectly funded by the food industry. Drawing parallels with tobacco control, the paper concludes that eliminating these conflicts is essential to formulating effective public health policy. Without structural change and the exclusion of industry actors from policymaking, rates of diet-related disease will continue to rise.
与饮食相关疾病的全球大流行日益被认为是由食品系统中的经济激励因素驱动的,这些因素推动了有害食品的营销和消费,包括超加工食品(UPF)。尽管国际社会就超加工食品的危害达成了共识,世界卫生组织、联合国儿童基金会等组织以及拉丁美洲各国政府也采取了预防政策,但英国的政策应对仍因广泛存在的利益冲突而受到影响。这些冲突存在于政府机构、监管机构、学术界和媒体机构之中,其中许多机构直接或间接受食品行业资助。该论文通过与烟草控制进行类比得出结论,消除这些冲突对于制定有效的公共卫生政策至关重要。如果不进行结构性变革,不让行业行为体参与决策,与饮食相关疾病的发病率将继续上升。