• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对日本接受脾切除术患者可获取的网络信息的评估。

Evaluation of information available on the web to patients undergoing splenectomy in Japan.

作者信息

Kita Masahiko

机构信息

Graduate School of Nursing, Osaka Metropolitan University, Japan.

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Japan.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2024 Dec 29;6:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100367. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100367
PMID:40692862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12277572/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the medical information available on the Web in Japanese to patients undergoing splenectomy.

METHODS

Japanese websites on splenectomy were identified by conducting a search on two Internet search engines. Scales were used to score readability, quality, understandability, and actionability. Correlation coefficients for the scale scores were calculated.

RESULTS

31 Japanese websites were included in the analysis. "The increased lifetime risk of infection post-splenectomy" and "the requirement to carry a patient card or another form of identification indicating post-splenectomy" was mentioned in 90.3 % (28/31) and 3.2 % (1/31) of websites, respectively. The mean (±standard deviation) grade on the Japanese Readability was 9.8 (±0.9). The actionability of 22 websites was less than 30 %. Positive correlations were found between readability and DISCERN scores ( = 0.37; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.64,  < 0.05) and between content score and actionability ( = 0.49; 95 %CI, 0.07 to 0.69,  < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese information on websites available to patients undergoing splenectomy was insufficient. The dissemination of information on specific infection prevention measures is needed but must be available at an appropriate readability level.

INNOVATION

Creating patient education materials using content score items may promote splenectomy patients coping infection prevention behaviors in Japan.

摘要

目的

评估日本网站上为接受脾切除术患者提供的医学信息。

方法

通过在两个互联网搜索引擎上进行搜索,找出有关脾切除术的日语网站。使用量表对可读性、质量、可理解性和可操作性进行评分。计算量表评分的相关系数。

结果

31个日语网站纳入分析。分别有90.3%(28/31)和3.2%(1/31)的网站提到了“脾切除术后感染终生风险增加”和“需要携带患者卡或其他表明脾切除术后的身份识别形式 ”。日语可读性的平均(±标准差)等级为9.8(±0.9)。22个网站的可操作性低于30%。可读性与DISCERN评分之间(= 0.37;95%置信区间[CI],0.01至0.64,<0.05)以及内容评分与可操作性之间(= 0.49;95%CI,0.07至0.69,<0.05)存在正相关。

结论

日本网站上为接受脾切除术患者提供的信息不足。需要传播有关特定感染预防措施的信息,但必须以适当的可读性水平提供。

创新

使用内容评分项目创建患者教育材料可能会促进日本脾切除术患者应对感染预防行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b52/12277572/1820e1f0f05d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b52/12277572/14a200753817/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b52/12277572/1820e1f0f05d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b52/12277572/14a200753817/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b52/12277572/1820e1f0f05d/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of information available on the web to patients undergoing splenectomy in Japan.对日本接受脾切除术患者可获取的网络信息的评估。
PEC Innov. 2024 Dec 29;6:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100367. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
3
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
4
Internet as a Source of Public Health Information on Acupuncture for Pain Relief: Credibility Assessment and Readability Analysis.互联网作为公众获取针灸缓解疼痛相关健康信息的来源:可信度评估与可读性分析。
Med Acupunct. 2024 Dec 17;36(6):350-358. doi: 10.1089/acu.2023.0136. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation.哺乳期乳房胀痛的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD006946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006946.pub3.
6
Quality of information on the internet related to bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review of the evidence.互联网上与膀胱疼痛综合征相关的信息质量:证据的系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2091-1. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
7
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.洗必泰漱口水作为牙龈健康的辅助治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD008676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2.
8
Oral and intranasal aspirin desensitisation for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease.用于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)诱发的呼吸道疾病的口服和鼻内阿司匹林脱敏疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 7;1(1):CD013476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013476.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review.患者教育信息材料评估标准:一项范围综述。
Health Info Libr J. 2023 Mar;40(1):3-28. doi: 10.1111/hir.12467. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).《患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)日本版的翻译、跨文化调适和验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23):15763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315763.
3
An Evaluation of Websites Offering Caregiver Education for Tracheostomy and Home Mechanical Ventilation.
为气管造口术和家庭机械通气提供护理者教育的网站评估。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb;56:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information.影响在线健康信息质量和可靠性的因素。
Digit Health. 2020 Aug 30;6:2055207620948996. doi: 10.1177/2055207620948996. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Prevention of infection in asplenic adult patients by general practitioners in France between 2013 and 2016 : Care for the asplenic patient in general practice.2013 年至 2016 年法国全科医生对无脾成人患者的感染预防:全科实践中的无脾患者护理。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01237-3.
6
Post-splenectomy Sepsis: A Review of the Literature.脾切除术后脓毒症:文献综述
Cureus. 2020 Feb 6;12(2):e6898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6898.
7
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
8
Adherence to vaccination guidelines post splenectomy: A five year follow up study.脾切除术后疫苗接种指南的依从性:一项五年随访研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):803-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis in patients with asplenia and hyposplenia: a retrospective cohort study.无脾症和脾功能减退患者术后严重败血症:一项回顾性队列研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jan;145(2):397-400. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002405. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
10
Patient education and recall regarding postsplenectomy immunizations.关于脾切除术后免疫接种的患者教育与回访。
J Surg Res. 2015 Dec;199(2):580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.063. Epub 2015 Jun 11.