• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国2型糖尿病患者中恩格列净与达格列净的成本效用分析。

Cost-utility analysis of empagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.

作者信息

Zhang Huiyuan, Chen Jiaojiao, Zhao Quan, Zhang Bei

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 7;13:1566101. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566101. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566101
PMID:40692889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12277269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, performs a reduction in the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients compared to dapagliflozin, which has been included in the national volume-based procurement in China. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term cost-utility of the addition of empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) versus dapagliflozin (10 mg) in T2DM patients with insufficient control by metformin monotherapy from the perspective of Chinese health care payers.

METHODS

The IQVIA CORE diabetes model was used for cost-utility analysis to compare the long-term economics of empagliflozin (10 or 25 mg) versus dapagliflozin (10 mg) respectively. In the two independent analyses, the discount rate was 5% per year, and the utility value was derived from the published literatures. The baseline demographic and biochemical data, as well as treatment efficacy data were obtained from the EMPA-REG MET clinical trial and network meta-analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with dapagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg improved the life expectancy by 0.011 and 0.02 years, and improved the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.011 and 0.02 years, respectively. The total cost of empagliflozin group (10 mg) was 279 Chinese Yuan lower than that of the dapagliflozin group (10 mg), making it an absolutely economical choice. The total cost of empagliflozin (25 mg) was expected to be 1,601 Chinese Yuan higher than dapagliflozin, with an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of 80,052 Chinese Yuan per QALY, below the set ‌willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of 85,698 Chinese Yuan per QALY.

CONCLUSION

For T2DM patients with insufficient control by metformin monotherapy, the addition of empagliflozin 10 mg showed better efficacy and lower cost compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg, making it an absolutely economical choice. Based on the set WTP threshold, empagliflozin 25 mg was also a more cost-effective treatment option than dapagliflozin from the perspective of Chinese healthcare payers.

摘要

背景

恩格列净是一种钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂,与达格列净相比,可降低2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率,达格列净已被纳入中国国家集中采购。本研究的目的是从中国医疗保健支付方的角度,评估在二甲双胍单药治疗控制不佳的T2DM患者中加用恩格列净(10毫克或25毫克)与达格列净(10毫克)的长期成本效益。

方法

使用IQVIA CORE糖尿病模型进行成本效益分析,以分别比较恩格列净(10毫克或25毫克)与达格列净(10毫克)的长期经济性。在两项独立分析中,贴现率为每年5%,效用值来自已发表的文献。基线人口统计学和生化数据以及治疗疗效数据分别来自EMPA-REG MET临床试验和网络荟萃分析。

结果

与达格列净10毫克相比,恩格列净10毫克和恩格列净25毫克分别使预期寿命延长0.011年和0.02年,质量调整生命年(QALY)分别提高0.011年和0.02年。恩格列净组(10毫克)的总成本比达格列净组(10毫克)低279元,使其成为绝对经济的选择。恩格列净(25毫克)的总成本预计比达格列净高1601元,增量成本效益比(ICUR)为每QALY 80,052元,低于设定的每QALY支付意愿(WTP)阈值85,698元。

结论

对于二甲双胍单药治疗控制不佳的T2DM患者,加用恩格列净10毫克与达格列净10毫克相比,疗效更好且成本更低,使其成为绝对经济的选择。基于设定的WTP阈值,从中国医疗保健支付方的角度来看,恩格列净25毫克也是比达格列净更具成本效益的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/b72c626d8209/fpubh-13-1566101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/d8ef531d3d98/fpubh-13-1566101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/f62250c8abde/fpubh-13-1566101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/c0b832546bc4/fpubh-13-1566101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/b72c626d8209/fpubh-13-1566101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/d8ef531d3d98/fpubh-13-1566101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/f62250c8abde/fpubh-13-1566101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/c0b832546bc4/fpubh-13-1566101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/745a/12277269/b72c626d8209/fpubh-13-1566101-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of empagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.在中国2型糖尿病患者中恩格列净与达格列净的成本效用分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 7;13:1566101. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566101. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the costs of glycemic response with canagliflozin versus dapagliflozin and empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Arab Emirates.在阿拉伯联合酋长国2型糖尿病患者中,评估卡格列净与达格列净和恩格列净作为二甲双胍附加治疗时的血糖反应成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jun;33(6):1155-1163. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1310091. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin monotherapy for treating type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.卡格列净、达格列净和恩格列净单药治疗2型糖尿病:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(2):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21020.
4
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Comparative safety of different recommended doses of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.不同推荐剂量的钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者中的比较安全性:一项系统评价和随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 10;14:1256548. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256548. eCollection 2023.
8
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin to Standard Treatment for Diabetic Kidney Disease in China.在中国,将达格列净和恩格列净添加到糖尿病肾病标准治疗方案中的成本效益分析
Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01462-7.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction and Methodology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.引言与方法:2025年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(1 Suppl 1):S1-S5. doi: 10.2337/dc25-SINT.
2
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会糖尿病患者心血管疾病管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 14;44(39):4043-4140. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Dapagliflozin Plus Standard Treatment for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in China.
达格列净联合标准治疗用于中国 2 型糖尿病合并心血管疾病高危患者的成本-效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;10:936703. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.936703. eCollection 2022.
4
Prevalence, Deaths and Disability-Adjusted-Life-Years (DALYs) Due to Type 2 Diabetes and Its Attributable Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年全球疾病负担研究:1990 年至 2019 年 204 个国家和地区 2 型糖尿病及其归因风险因素的患病率、死亡率和伤残调整生命年(DALYs)。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 25;13:838027. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.838027. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus iDegLira in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy.在2型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素利司那肽与德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和口服降糖治疗控制不佳者的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3231-3241. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Cost-effectiveness of intensification with SGLT2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes.SGLT2 抑制剂强化治疗 2 型糖尿病的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(8):e269-e277. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88728.
7
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.恩格列净与卡格列净、达格列净或标准治疗方案相比在2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001313.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis: SGLT2 inhibitors, blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes.系统评价与荟萃分析:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、血压与心血管结局
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Feb 10;33:100725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100725. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in patients with Type 2 diabetes in China.恩格列净与格列美脲在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Apr;10(6):469-480. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0284. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009.