• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恩格列净与格列美脲在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in patients with Type 2 diabetes in China.

机构信息

IQVIA, Real World Solutions, Zaventem 1930, Belgium.

Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Apr;10(6):469-480. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0284. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2020-0284
PMID:33576249
Abstract

The study assesses the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with Type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled by metformin alone in China, based on the EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial. A calibrated version of the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was used. Cost of complications and utility were taken from literature. The Chinese healthcare system perspective and 5% discounting rates were applied. Empagliflozin+metformin provides additional quality-adjusted life-years (0.317) driven by a reduction in the number of cardiovascular and renal events, for an additional cost of $1382 (CNY9703) compared with glimepiride+metformin. Empagliflozin is cost-effective treatment versus glimepiride applying a threshold of $30,290 (CNY212,676).

摘要

本研究基于 EMPA-REG H2H-SU 试验,评估了恩格列净相对于格列美脲在二甲双胍单药控制不佳的中国 2 型糖尿病患者中的成本效益。使用了经过校准的 IQVIA Core Diabetes Model。并发症的成本和效用来自文献。采用中国医疗保健系统视角和 5%的贴现率。与格列美脲+二甲双胍相比,恩格列净+二甲双胍可通过减少心血管和肾脏事件来增加质量调整生命年(0.317),额外成本为 1382 美元(9703 元人民币)。如果采用 30290 美元(212676 元人民币)的阈值,恩格列净相对于格列美脲是具有成本效益的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in patients with Type 2 diabetes in China.恩格列净与格列美脲在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Apr;10(6):469-480. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0284. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride.与服用格列美脲的2型糖尿病患者相比,服用恩格列净的2型糖尿病患者的治疗满意度。
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1199-207. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1140-2. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Analysis of Fractures in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Empagliflozin in Pooled Data From Placebo-Controlled Trials and a Head-to-Head Study Versus Glimepiride.恩格列净治疗 2 型糖尿病患者骨折的分析:来自安慰剂对照试验和与格列美脲头对头研究的汇总数据。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1809-1816. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1525. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin compared with liraglutide based on cardiovascular outcome trials in Type II diabetes.恩格列净与利拉鲁肽比较的成本效益:基于 2 型糖尿病心血管结局试验。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Aug;9(11):781-794. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0071. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin in Japan Based on Results From the Asian subpopulation in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.基于 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验亚洲亚组人群的结果对恩格列净在日本的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2021-2040.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Greece.依帕列净治疗伴心血管风险升高的希腊 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 May;38(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x.
7
The cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin in Type 2 diabetes in Denmark.丹麦 2 型糖尿病患者中口服司美格鲁肽与恩格列净的成本效益比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):29-37. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0169. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide versus glimepiride as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients in China.利拉鲁肽对比格列美脲作为中国 2 型糖尿病患者二甲双胍添加治疗的成本效用分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):436-44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000608. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States: Findings Based on the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.恩格列净治疗美国糖尿病肾病患者的成本效果:基于 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验的研究结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Jun;79(6):796-806. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin versus glimepiride as monotherapy in a Chinese population with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,达格列净与格列美脲单药治疗的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):359-369. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1257978. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of empagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.在中国2型糖尿病患者中恩格列净与达格列净的成本效用分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 7;13:1566101. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566101. eCollection 2025.
2
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
3
Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review.
中国国家医保谈判药品的已发表药物经济学评价中存在的赞助偏倚:一项系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov 29;8(11):e012780. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780.
4
Healthcare resource utilization in patients treated with empagliflozin in East Asia.东亚接受恩格列净治疗的患者的医疗资源利用情况。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 May;13(5):810-821. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13728. Epub 2022 Jan 11.