Suppr超能文献

快速系统文献综述:生态研究中的相机陷阱采样:野生动物福利考量

Rapid systematic literature review: Camera trap sampling in ecological studies: Considerations of wildlife welfare.

作者信息

Nogues Emeline, Arends Ava, von Keyserlingk Marina A G

机构信息

Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.

出版信息

Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 30;34:e44. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10014. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The use of camera traps in wildlife conservation and ecological research is a popular method of data capture due in large part to the perceived low interference levels for the animals being studied. However, evidence exists that some species alter their behaviour when exposed to this technology. The primary aim of this study was to address whether researchers working with this technology in the ecology and forestry fields are making considerations for the possible impacts of cameras on animal behaviour. A secondary aim was to investigate how the use of this technology is framed in recent publications. In this rapid systematic literature review, we conducted a search on Web of Science and we identified 267 papers published in the last five years, in the fields of ecology and forestry, that met our inclusion criteria. We screened the studies for mentions of the impact of camera traps on the welfare of wildlife. Surprisingly, only 7.5% of the papers considered the possible animal welfare impacts of camera use on the wildlife species of interest in their study, with most comparing it to invasive methods and therefore framing this technology positively. We strongly encourage researchers working in this field to consider the impact of this technology on the specific species being studied. Whilst we recognise that the use of camera traps avoids direct handling of the animals, the short- and long-term effects of using this technology should not be ignored and should, at a minimum, be acknowledged in the limitations.

摘要

在野生动物保护和生态研究中使用相机陷阱是一种常用的数据采集方法,这在很大程度上是因为人们认为它对被研究动物的干扰水平较低。然而,有证据表明,一些物种在接触这项技术时会改变其行为。本研究的主要目的是探讨在生态和林业领域使用这项技术的研究人员是否考虑到相机对动物行为可能产生的影响。次要目的是调查在最近的出版物中这项技术的使用是如何被阐述的。在这项快速系统的文献综述中,我们在科学网进行了搜索,确定了过去五年在生态和林业领域发表的267篇符合我们纳入标准的论文。我们筛选这些研究,看是否提及相机陷阱对野生动物福利的影响。令人惊讶的是,只有7.5%的论文考虑了相机使用对其研究中感兴趣的野生动物物种可能产生的动物福利影响,大多数研究将其与侵入性方法进行比较,因此对这项技术持积极态度。我们强烈鼓励该领域的研究人员考虑这项技术对所研究的特定物种的影响。虽然我们认识到使用相机陷阱避免了对动物的直接处理,但这项技术的短期和长期影响不应被忽视,至少应在局限性中予以承认。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d3a/12277094/674c653d9e77/S0962728625100146_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验