Suppr超能文献

不同针灸疗法治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效:一项网状Meta分析

Efficacy of Different Acupuncture Therapies for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Qin Peipei, Cao Xun, Ni Hua, Yang Liu, Tong Yiman, Dang Mengbo, Xu Juan

机构信息

Rehabilitation Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221006, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 17;18:3653-3673. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S530646. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) presents substantial therapeutic challenges, as existing drug therapies demonstrate limited efficacy and often cause adverse effects. These limitations highlight the need to explore non-pharmacological alternatives.

PURPOSE

This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of eight acupuncture therapies versus usual treatment (UT) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).

RESULTS

From 67 RCTs (5961 patients), all acupuncture modalities outperformed conventional drugs in clinical efficacy (P<0.05), with long-needle acupuncture ranking highest (SUCRA 88.7%). Specific outcomes revealed: 1) symptom scores: thumb-tack needle (SUCRA 90.9%) and long-needle acupuncture (72.2%) showed the greatest NIH-CPSI reduction; 2) Pain: long-needle acupuncture (76.3%) and acupoint catgut embedding (69.3%) ranked top; 3) Urination: long-needle acupuncture (82.9%) and conventional acupuncture (47.9%) surpassed UT; 4) Quality of life: thumb-tack needle (72.3%), electroacupuncture (65.6%) and long-needle acupuncture (64.1%) were optimal. Long-needle acupuncture consistently demonstrated superior efficacy across both subjective symptoms and objective measures.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture therapies, especially long-needle acupuncture, are more effective than UT for CP/CPPS, providing comprehensive symptom relief, pain reduction, and functional improvement, with long-needle acupuncture emerging as the most robust intervention.

摘要

背景

慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)带来了巨大的治疗挑战,因为现有的药物治疗疗效有限且常引起不良反应。这些局限性凸显了探索非药物替代疗法的必要性。

目的

本网状Meta分析旨在评估八种针灸疗法与常规治疗(UT)对慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)的比较疗效。

结果

从67项随机对照试验(5961例患者)中得出,所有针灸方式在临床疗效上均优于传统药物(P<0.05),其中长针针灸排名最高(累积排序曲线下面积为88.7%)。具体结果显示:1)症状评分:揿针(累积排序曲线下面积为90.9%)和长针针灸(72.2%)使美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)降低幅度最大;2)疼痛:长针针灸(76.3%)和穴位埋线(69.3%)排名靠前;3)排尿:长针针灸(82.9%)和传统针灸(47.9%)优于常规治疗;4)生活质量:揿针(72.3%)、电针(65.6%)和长针针灸(64.1%)效果最佳。长针针灸在主观症状和客观指标方面均始终显示出卓越疗效。

结论

针灸疗法,尤其是长针针灸,对CP/CPPS的治疗效果优于常规治疗,能全面缓解症状、减轻疼痛并改善功能,长针针灸成为最有效的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f0/12278984/bbbbf48b1439/JPR-18-3653-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验