Huang Chao-Lan, Huang Chien-Sheng, Lee Yi-Ying, Lu Chun-Ching, Chiang Ting-Yun, Teng Wei-Nung, Chang Wen-Kuei, Ting Chien-Kun
Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2025 Sep 1;88(9):681-685. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001269. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
Flexible bronchoscopy is frequently employed for therapeutic interventions in tracheal lesions, but airway management during these procedures is challenging due to the need to share the airway for both ventilation and instrumentation. Endotracheal intubation, while providing a secure airway, often requires repeated insertion and removal of the tube to allow for bronchoscopic access. Additionally, the narrower internal diameter of the endotracheal tube can limit the maneuverability of the bronchoscope, making procedures more technically demanding. In contrast, the supraglottic airway (SGA)-originally developed by an anesthesiologist known as laryngeal mask-is a less invasive device that sits above the larynx and forms a seal around the glottic opening to allow for effective ventilation. SGAs typically have a wider lumen and do not require repeated placement during procedures, offering a more convenient and potentially safer conduit for flexible bronchoscopy. Despite these advantages, direct comparative evidence on the safety and efficacy of SGA vs endotracheal intubation in this context remains lacking.
We reviewed charts and perioperative data regarding patients who underwent tracheal therapeutic procedures using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2019 and 2024. The primary outcome was the total number of repeated airway manipulations required. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation, ventilation, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related complications.
A total of 65 procedures were analyzed. There was a significantly higher proportion of female patients in the SGA group (67.7%) compared with the endotracheal intubation group (22.9%, p < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed a significant reduction in the requirement for repeated airway manipulations with the SGA compared with endotracheal intubation ( p < 0.001). The median lowest oxygen saturation was higher with SGA (97% vs 94%, p = 0.001), while end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) levels were comparable (45 vs 44 mmHg, p = 0.94). In addition, patients in the SGA group were weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier and had significantly shorter hospital stays (5.5 vs 30 days, p < 0.001).
Compared with endotracheal intubation, the SGA is an effective alternative for airway management during therapeutic tracheal procedures using flexible bronchoscopy. It reduces the need for repeated airway manipulation, provides better oxygenation with comparable ventilation, maintains continuous airway control, and serves as a reliable conduit for bronchoscope insertion.
可弯曲支气管镜常用于气管病变的治疗干预,但在这些操作过程中气道管理具有挑战性,因为通气和器械操作需要共用气道。气管内插管虽然能提供安全气道,但往往需要反复插入和拔出气管导管以进行支气管镜检查。此外,气管内导管较窄的内径会限制支气管镜的可操作性,使操作在技术上要求更高。相比之下,声门上气道(SGA)——最初由一位名为喉罩的麻醉医生发明——是一种侵入性较小的装置,位于喉上方,围绕声门开口形成密封以实现有效通气。SGA通常管腔更宽,操作过程中无需反复放置,为可弯曲支气管镜检查提供了更方便且可能更安全的通道。尽管有这些优点,但在这种情况下SGA与气管内插管安全性和有效性的直接对比证据仍然缺乏。
我们回顾了2019年至2024年期间在台北荣民总医院接受全身麻醉下使用可弯曲支气管镜进行气管治疗操作的患者的病历和围手术期数据。主要结局是所需反复气道操作的总数。次要结局包括氧合、通气、住院时间和与操作相关的并发症。
共分析了65例操作。与气管内插管组(22.9%)相比,SGA组女性患者比例显著更高(67.7%,p<0.001)。曼-惠特尼U检验显示,与气管内插管相比,SGA所需反复气道操作显著减少(p<0.001)。SGA组最低氧饱和度中位数更高(97%对94%,p=0.001),而呼气末二氧化碳(EtCO₂)水平相当(45对44mmHg,p=0.94)。此外,SGA组患者机械通气撤机更早,住院时间显著更短(5.5对30天,p<0.001)。
与气管内插管相比,SGA是使用可弯曲支气管镜进行气管治疗操作时气道管理的有效替代方法。它减少了反复气道操作的需求,在通气相当的情况下提供更好的氧合,维持持续气道控制,并作为支气管镜插入的可靠通道。