Popescu Sorin Ștefan, Elsner Christian, Kucharz Noemi, Rhein Valerie Zu, Engewald Clarissa, Pardey Kai, Tilz Roland Richard
Klinik für Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Standort Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00399-025-01095-5.
Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is typically performed via femoral venous access. To reduce bleeding complications and shorten hospital stays, venous closure devices are gaining importance. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the impact of closure devices, "tagesstationär" (2 day-case stay with night leave) billing, and early recovery room (post-anesthesia care unit, PACU) discharge on economic indicators, patient-related outcomes, and staffing requirements.
Based on data from the STYLE-AF study-including PACU length of stay, groin bleeding rates, and additional outcome parameters-supplemented by expert interviews and literature review, we conducted a simulation study and real-world implementation to analyze various scenarios: use of closure devices, "tagesstationär" discharge billing, early PACU discharge, and combinations thereof. Primary endpoints were time savings in the PACU, changes in groin bleeding probability, and gains in patient comfort quantified by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
The exclusive use of closure devices led to a 6.5% increase in case throughput and a gain of 0.0034 QALYs per patient. When combined with same-day discharge billing, the contribution margin increased by € 415 per case. Switching to same-day discharge billing without closure devices yielded a € 388.80 higher revenue per case but did not result in QALY gains or staff workload reductions. The most substantial effects were observed with the combined implementation of all measures: a 25% increase in case volume, € 661.27 higher contribution margin per patient, up to 24% relative reduction in PACU staff workload, and a QALY gain of 0.0034.
Closure devices, particularly when integrated with process optimizations and "tagesstationär" discharge billing, provide significant multidimensional benefits across economic performance (contribution margin), resource efficiency (PACU time), and patient outcomes (QALYs through reduced groin bleeding)-contingent on institutional context and consistent implementation.
心律失常的导管消融术通常经股静脉入路进行。为减少出血并发症并缩短住院时间,静脉闭合装置的重要性日益凸显。本研究旨在定量评估闭合装置、“日间住院”(2天住院且夜间可离院)计费方式以及早期恢复室(麻醉后护理单元,PACU)出院对经济指标、患者相关结局和人员配备需求的影响。
基于STYLE - AF研究的数据(包括PACU住院时长、腹股沟出血率及其他结局参数),并辅以专家访谈和文献综述,我们进行了一项模拟研究及实际应用分析,以探讨各种情况:使用闭合装置、“日间住院”出院计费、早期PACU出院及其组合。主要终点为PACU节省的时间、腹股沟出血概率的变化以及通过质量调整生命年(QALY)量化的患者舒适度提升。
单纯使用闭合装置使病例处理量增加6.5%,每位患者的QALY增加0.0034。与当日出院计费相结合时,每例病例的边际贡献增加415欧元。在不使用闭合装置的情况下改用当日出院计费,每例病例的收入增加388.80欧元,但未带来QALY提升或工作人员工作量减少。所有措施联合实施时效果最为显著:病例量增加25%,每位患者的边际贡献增加661.27欧元,PACU工作人员工作量相对减少多达24%,QALY增加0.0034。
闭合装置,尤其是与流程优化及“日间住院”出院计费相结合时,在经济绩效(边际贡献)、资源效率(PACU时间)和患者结局(通过减少腹股沟出血实现QALY)方面带来显著的多维度益处,但这取决于机构背景和一致的实施情况。